The world belongs to those who can extract, or create rent-extracting systems and networks.
"Creators" probably the least well-served of any labour cateogory, relative to their contribution.
Straight-up wage labour is also under-served, and often below the point of sustenance, but it's the contribution ratio I'm looking at.
In A Farewell to Alms, Gregory Clark (UC Davis) lists the inventors responsible for the first Industrial Revolution. Of eight or so inventors, 3-4 died in poverty, another 3-4 survived only on other activities, or through legislative compensation. Only one or two actually profited by the work they're known for.
http://www.worldcat.org/title/farewell-to-alms-a-brief-econo...
Vaclav Smil points out that the diesel engine and gas turbine are the two prime movers most responsible for all modern power production (either motive or electrical). Otto Diesel committed suicide after financial ruin. Parsons, inventor of the gas turbine, did relatively well, but failed to be recognised for the vast bulk of benefit for his work, which was posthumous.
Creativity is fun, it's intellectually rewarding. Don't think for a moment that market economies offer remunerative compensation with anything resembling consistency, rationality, or proportionality.