Live data from Hacker News

Chris Lattner Joins Google Brain

techcrunch.com

41–50 of 111 posts

Re: Chris Lattner Joins Google Brain

#41
post #38

Just wondering - does a normal person stand a chance to join Google Brain, or do you need to make node.js, swift, own self-driving car or another crazy project to get in?

Not sure about in general, but it seems like their residency program [0] gives a good shot at landing on the team afterwards and is accessible to "normal" people passionate about ML

[0] https://research.google.com/teams/brain/residency/

Re: Chris Lattner Joins Google Brain

#42
post #8

Is Google's work culture more like Apple or Tesla? Curious if this is likely to address whatever about Telsa wasn't keeping him happy. Or maybe it was more about the specific work he was tasked to do?

I've worked at both Google and Apple. They're very similar, but in general with big tech companies there's more variation between teams than there is between companies on average.

Re: Chris Lattner Joins Google Brain

#46
post #35
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not now, but if you can really create AI, it shouldn't be indistinguishable of human Intelligence. My point is that it is unlikely to make big steps now to advance in PL, but it is very likely you can do it in AI. The last 5 years have been crazy and the people working on it now is much more than few years ago. Note: most probably you wont be getting human-like AI anytime soon

> Not now, but if you can really create AI, it shouldn't be indistinguishable of human Intelligence. If we really create AI that is "indistinguishable of human Intelligence", then all questions about human jobs or research become moot, no? If someone was to create AI that is human-equivalent (aka strong AI) then that would be their final project as a human being. There would be no need for human professional or acade…

Well... They said the same in the industrial era. There are a lot of things to consider, for example:

- AI might not like to work, as we don't like to work

- You suppose that if you create AI then the AI can create a more intelligence AI and this to the infinity. We don't know if the intelligence is unlimited or limited. We might have reach the top intelligence. (note: the more intelligent the brain the slower it is, and a bigger brain does not relate to intelligence)

Re: Chris Lattner Joins Google Brain

#47
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because not every problem can be solved by AI.

Not now, but if you can really create AI, it shouldn't be indistinguishable of human Intelligence. My point is that it is unlikely to make big steps now to advance in PL, but it is very likely you can do it in AI. The last 5 years have been crazy and the people working on it now is much more than few years ago. Note: most probably you wont be getting human-like AI anytime soon

Sounds a lot like saying people should get into management so that they can get other people to do stuff for them. People can do anything people can do, so you should get into people.

And it's totally true! A good manager can make anything happen that their team can accomplish, and their impact can be huge. But some people want to actually work on the stuff, not work on the stuff that works on the stuff.

Re: Chris Lattner Joins Google Brain

#48
post #2

I was kind of worried he would not find anything... :D Seriously, I wonder if stars like Lattner even need to submit a CV or their mail simply floods with offers.

When he tweeted about leaving Tesla, he got about sixteen billion replies from people asking him to come work for them.

Re: Chris Lattner Joins Google Brain

#49
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My mistake. I skimmed over the word "Land" without really noticing it. Add voice dictation and things get even weirder. A lot of times it's magical with some crazy word thrown in.

Agreed on the voice thing. I've found some really odd sound alikes in my comments when I've used it (trust me it sucks to type a long response on a phone keyboard :-) A common one is substituting 'by' and 'buy' at different times.

It's always fun to try to dictate "wreck a nice beach." It's such a classic example of sound-alikes gone wrong that it seems engines go out of their way to interpret it as "recognize speech" unless you take extreme measures.
Post reply on HN