This continues to be one of my favorite questions. In high school we were creating a vacuum in a bell jar to do the 'drop a feather and drop a weight' experiment and my physics teacher asked it. "So if we didn't have our apparatus in there, and we sucked it dry, what would be in there?" It makes a great interview question because it helps identify people who have a hard time holding an unknown concept in their head a…
I went into entrepreneurship because I hate these kinds of interviews. You think a good way to tell whether I'd be good at writing code is my opinion on philosophy outside my domain of expertise?
> You think a good way to tell whether I'd be good at
> writing code is my opinion on philosophy outside my
> domain of expertise?
It is a way (I'm not sure how to quantify it) to understand if someone can develop something that nobody has ever imagined before. My criteria for evaluating the response was whether or not the candidate could engage with the question. It is something that happened often in my experience at Google, you were presented with an 'impossible' requirements and it was up to you to figure out what you could do about it. If someone was going to say "Well I don't know anything about that, ask someone else." Then the company knew they weren't going to be as successful as we would want them to be.In the case of the physics student it was just their passion, they had gone way beyond the course work because they were interested in interesting questions.