41–50 of 85 posts
feel free to make a better one
>I pay them. My work pays them.
Github is raking in oodles of cash and they STILL can't keep their service up without going down, quoted from OP, "[e]very couple months".
It's not about "making a better one", nor is it about paying for the fancier/premium features; it's about the uninterrupted service, which Github keeps failing to provide.
feel free to make a better one
It's called GitLab. Not 100% uptime but better (and constantly improving)
Problems are to be expected. But as great as it is that they had multiple levels of backup, none of them worked. They hadn't even been tested.
As others have said, Github's postmortems are always great. But frankly, I'd rather they have better uptime. Every couple months is too much. I pay them. My work pays them. If their CEO is serious about zero downtime, how about he offers his paying customers a credit for time they cannot access the service?
Maybe switch to bitbucket or other competition for a while?
A little funny like Silicon Valley episode , saw the news from GitHub CEO yesterday saying our goal is zero downtime and now it's down
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's called GitLab. Not 100% uptime but better (and constantly improving)
Gitlab does not have features parity with Github. I personally also stumbled upon a bizzare bug that doesn't allow a friend to add me to any of his private repo's. Asked on IRC and nothing much came of it unfortunately.
Which features would you like to see in GitLab? We'd love to talk about it. You could also open a feature proposal issues in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's called GitLab. Not 100% uptime but better (and constantly improving)
It will take a long time before GitLab can even begin to regain my trust from their missing-backups outage. Problems are to be expected. But as great as it is that they had multiple levels of backup, none of them worked . They hadn't even been tested.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It will take a long time before GitLab can even begin to regain my trust from their missing-backups outage. Problems are to be expected. But as great as it is that they had multiple levels of backup, none of them worked . They hadn't even been tested.
Do you have any evidence that Github does any better?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's called GitLab. Not 100% uptime but better (and constantly improving)
It will take a long time before GitLab can even begin to regain my trust from their missing-backups outage. Problems are to be expected. But as great as it is that they had multiple levels of backup, none of them worked . They hadn't even been tested.