Screenshotting or PDFing of a website is an increasingly important archiving tool, to supplement wget. I've come across a lot of websites that won't render any content if not connected to a live server.
I.e. DOM copy > screenshot > wget?
41–50 of 70 posts
Screenshotting or PDFing of a website is an increasingly important archiving tool, to supplement wget. I've come across a lot of websites that won't render any content if not connected to a live server.
I.e. DOM copy > screenshot > wget?
If it would be connected to Pinboard.in as an alternative to Pocket I would be screaming with joy. :-)
Screenshotting or PDFing of a website is an increasingly important archiving tool, to supplement wget. I've come across a lot of websites that won't render any content if not connected to a live server.
Well, I took a screenshot, better than nothing.
Now if only Chromium could learn to write WARC archives, then it would be on par! :) Great project!
What version of Google Chrome do you need for the PDF export to work? I tried it on 58.0.3029.96 (Linux) and this does nothing (no error messages, it just quits without writing any files): $ google-chrome --headless --disable-gpu --print-to-pdf ' http://example.com' Edit: I'm completely baffled that such widely used software as Google Chrome can have this written in the man page: "Google Chrome has hundreds of undocu…
If it would be connected to Pinboard.in as an alternative to Pocket I would be screaming with joy. :-)
Just for articles, mind you, not entire websites.
Screenshotting or PDFing of a website is an increasingly important archiving tool, to supplement wget. I've come across a lot of websites that won't render any content if not connected to a live server.
Wouldn't a copy of the DOM be even better than a screenshot? I.e. DOM copy > screenshot > wget?