Live data from Hacker News

Alternative search engines to Google (2016)

searchenginewatch.com

41–50 of 87 posts

Re: Alternative search engines to Google (2016)

#41
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bing: http://i.imgur.com/ChfIVts.png Google: http://imgur.com/47UUNBc.png

Hmm, that doesn't seem to work here (The Netherlands). Maybe that's US only?

Works in the UK too. Maybe if you search for "speed test" in Dutch?

Re: Alternative search engines to Google (2016)

#42
post #14
post #5

Bing offers a bit of a dilemma. On the one hand, its search relevancy is actually really great, its special search features (weather, elections, etc.) and graph tools are generally better than Google's and they overall just seem to try harder on search nowadays. On the other hand, search isn't the only important thing - presumably that is why Google doesn't seem to focus there. Bing has seemingly given up on some of…

One of my favorite things on Bing: https://www.bing.com/search?q=speed+test

it's not working then... not very useful (for me)

Re: Alternative search engines to Google (2016)

#45
post #6

I recently discovered Ecosia (ecosia.org). Seems to use results from Bing, maps from Google, and has an easy 'out' to show results from Google. Nice 'hook' as well. From their About Us page: 'Ecosia is a social business run by a small group of dedicated people. We work together to create tools that empower everyone to easily do good by planting trees. We believe our trees have the power to make this world a better pl…

Thanks for mentioning Ecosia. I was actually working for them over a year ago.

They're a bunch of really good people on a great mission.

Re: Alternative search engines to Google (2016)

#46

I've been using DuckDuckGo for about a year without ill-effects. Although sometimes I have to go to Google, often when the results are disappointing I try !g and the results with Google are just as disappointing. It's also actually easier to switch to an image search using !gi than it is to click the image search with the mouse at Google's site.

DuckDuckGo isn't that great, but the !bang options make it easy to diversify, and branch searches to multiple targets, to compare outcomes. Two things become obvious at that point, and the main one is that other search engines don't just customize search results to individuals, they actually spend costly human resources currating and QA'ing results. DuckDuckGo's search results kind of suck, and the reason they're not…

(!i takes you straight to Google Images)

Re: Alternative search engines to Google (2016)

#47
post #5

Bing offers a bit of a dilemma. On the one hand, its search relevancy is actually really great, its special search features (weather, elections, etc.) and graph tools are generally better than Google's and they overall just seem to try harder on search nowadays. On the other hand, search isn't the only important thing - presumably that is why Google doesn't seem to focus there. Bing has seemingly given up on some of…

> Bing has seemingly given up on some of the big things, like Maps

As far as I'm aware Bing (along with Facebook and Yahoo!) are backing https://wego.here.com/ these days. I'm curious to see where that goes...

Re: Alternative search engines to Google (2016)

#49

I've been using DuckDuckGo for about a year without ill-effects. Although sometimes I have to go to Google, often when the results are disappointing I try !g and the results with Google are just as disappointing. It's also actually easier to switch to an image search using !gi than it is to click the image search with the mouse at Google's site.

DuckDuckGo isn't that great, but the !bang options make it easy to diversify, and branch searches to multiple targets, to compare outcomes. Two things become obvious at that point, and the main one is that other search engines don't just customize search results to individuals, they actually spend costly human resources currating and QA'ing results. DuckDuckGo's search results kind of suck, and the reason they're not…

> DuckDuckGo isn't that great

Do you mind elaborating on this a bit? I've been using DDG for a couple of years now and, although at the beginning I would fallback to Google very often, now that changed. I still fallback to Google from time to time, but it's more to have a confirmation that, as parent says, the results are disappointing than anything else. Now I probably use Google after trying g DDG once in every 10/15 queries. It used to be one in three when I switched.

To be honest, I even find DDG to be way way better than Google in certain results. Programming related queries that would produce StackOverflow results are one example. And I'm not even considering the preview feature that DDG has that shows you the accepted answer to the SO question right in the search page.

One thing I don't like though, is the way the images and videos preview works (not in the image tab, in the search tab) on DDG. I find that row of videos/images to just be annoying since I would explicitly make an image search if that's what I needed.

That said, my experience now is that if DDG results are disappointing, there's a very very high chance that Google results will be disappointing too.

Re: Alternative search engines to Google (2016)

#50
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Should it do something special? It doesn't seem to be the case for me, I see nothing unexpected.

Bing: http://i.imgur.com/ChfIVts.png Google: http://imgur.com/47UUNBc.png

OOKLA isn't that reliable for speed testing, they let companies who pay mess with the results, some ISPs who sense your going to ookla give you better bandwidth, etc.

look at the link : :https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/42zh66/what...

Search for ookla, or just read the thing for speedtest recommendations.

Recommendations:

http://speedof.me

google supported tool: http://www.measurementlab.net/tools/ndt , http://www.measurementlab.net/tests - various types of tests

Post reply on HN