Please do not complain into the echo chamber of comments here. Please take a moment to support the EFF, call your representatives, and speak to friends and family. EFF: https://www.eff.org/ Find your reps: https://tryvoices.com/
The House just voted to wipe out the FCC’s landmark Internet privacy protections
41–50 of 534 posts
Re: The House just voted to wipe out the FCC’s landmark Internet privacy protections
#42Re: The House just voted to wipe out the FCC’s landmark Internet privacy protections
#43Re: The House just voted to wipe out the FCC’s landmark Internet privacy protections
#44It's a bit disappointing to see that aside from a few abstained votes, everybody just chose to vote along party lines. Do these people just rubber stamp a bill because there's a D or an R next to it? Even if it meant more nay votes for the bill, I really wish we had representatives that vote based on critical thought rather than what their friends were doing. I mean, as long as I'm dreaming too, we should give assemb…
You might have a few R's (Amash?) that will pull the Libertarian card saying that free market should resolve this one it's own...choosing to ignore reality...the monopoly (just about) every American faces when it comes to choice for an ISP.
And obviously all the D's will vote yes as the rules were created and established in a Dem FCC / Presidency.
Despite party, it is sad to see quotes like Blackburn's carry any weight on any periodical outside of the puzzle section containing a where's waldo-esq spot the BS.
Here is the actual roll call for anyone curious, I had trouble finding it...maybe because the vote was so recent?: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2017/roll200.xml
Re: The House just voted to wipe out the FCC’s landmark Internet privacy protections
#45Re: The House just voted to wipe out the FCC’s landmark Internet privacy protections
#46Doesn't this mean the government can basically buy user data through shell corps and bypass warrants all together?
Re: The House just voted to wipe out the FCC’s landmark Internet privacy protections
#47It's a bit disappointing to see that aside from a few abstained votes, everybody just chose to vote along party lines. Do these people just rubber stamp a bill because there's a D or an R next to it? Even if it meant more nay votes for the bill, I really wish we had representatives that vote based on critical thought rather than what their friends were doing. I mean, as long as I'm dreaming too, we should give assemb…
I assume you know how to pitch manure, program a computer, and cook a tasty meal. Yet tell me, how long would it take you to butcher a hog from carcass to grocery portions? Have you ever done so?
How long would it take you to plan an invasion of the scale of the landings at Inchon? Have you ever done so?
Re: The House just voted to wipe out the FCC’s landmark Internet privacy protections
#48It's a bit disappointing to see that aside from a few abstained votes, everybody just chose to vote along party lines. Do these people just rubber stamp a bill because there's a D or an R next to it? Even if it meant more nay votes for the bill, I really wish we had representatives that vote based on critical thought rather than what their friends were doing. I mean, as long as I'm dreaming too, we should give assemb…
Pretty much, yes. It's fucking depressing.
Re: The House just voted to wipe out the FCC’s landmark Internet privacy protections
#49(2) HTTPS makes a limited amount of sense. Even on encrypted connections, ISPs know which domains you visit. In some situations they may also be able to MITM your certificates and read the data you transmit.
(3) Any semblance of privacy now requires either a reputable VPN or TOR.
Re: The House just voted to wipe out the FCC’s landmark Internet privacy protections
#50I can't pretend I know what it's like to be a general layperson about tech, but my base instinct is that this issue of Internet privacy protections is much more salient to the average person than SOPA. Yet even as a follower of politics, I barely heard about this until last week when the Senate voted on it.
I can think of a couple of factors:
1. Internet giants advocated heavily against SOPA. Those same companies have less incentive to argue against selling user data, even though selling data at the ISP level is, to me, substantially different than at the website/service level.
2. So much political energy and attention has been spent on the Trump Administration, particularly on the recent push to repeal Obamacare. IIRC, even though SOPA didn't get much media coverage until around the week of the blackout, it wasn't competing with anything quite as big as this past week's vote on Obamacare (nevermind the other issues surrounding the executive branch).
[0] https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/senate-bill/968...
[1] https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/3261...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_SOPA_and_PIPA
Edit: Worth pointing out the Senate vote from last week, in which no Republican broke ranks in a 50-48 vote. 2 Republicans were not present (edit: I originally wrote "abstained"), including Sen. Rand Paul who is listed as a co-sponsor:
https://projects.propublica.org/represent/votes/115/senate/1...
https://www.flake.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases...