Live data from Hacker News

South Korean President Impeached

khnews.kheraldm.com

41–50 of 130 posts

Re: South Korean President Impeached

#41
post #3

This is obviously a bit pedantic but technically she was already impeached. This article is about her being convicted in the impeachment trial. The post title also doesn't match with the article title which more correctly states that she's been ousted.

Technically, she wasn't impeached.

But the way impeachment process works in SK, once the process begins, you are no longer able to function as president.

So 'effectively', she was already impeached.

Obviously I'm the one being pedantic. lol.

Re: South Korean President Impeached

#46
post #36
post #9

This is huge. Early analysis is that this is a net positive for Korean democracy since the entire process, from protests to ouster was relatively peaceful and the people involved in the ouster tried to follow the rule of law as much as possible. It's exercised for the first time a part of the legal system that's never been explored in the country. At each stage of the very complex process, the government figured out…

My cousin is a historian of Korea, and well, Korean herself. She says this president is like Korea's GWB. Shamelessly very right wing, a lot of gaffes related to speech and behavior. There are going to be a lot of happy people tonight.

sorry, but what's GWB stands for?

Re: South Korean President Impeached

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually, 50% of electorate has below median IQ.

Specifically for the IQ, isn't the average designed to be the median? It's a normal distribution after all.

Can't actually have a normal distribution that has a bound on one end...

Re: South Korean President Impeached

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Man, that's the entire reason I read /r/worldnews. A ton of people compete to have the best recap on why something is relevant, and the best rises to the top. Like, the point of comments is people putting out their opinions. In the process some people post who are more informed, and others less. Give it a few hours, and you can skim the top comments, and get a damned decent read on a situation. If someone didn't want…

Executive summaries (aka summaries without statements by uninformed / non-inside sources)? Statements of other facts or viewpoints that weren't considered? Laying out the logical argument as to why this has an impact on the future of SK versus just stating they think it's significant? Lots of reasons?

The commenter pretty clearly laid out why he thought it was significant: "It's exercised for the first time a part of the legal system that's never been explored in the country."

...that seems pretty important to me.

Re: South Korean President Impeached

#49
post #41
post #3

This is obviously a bit pedantic but technically she was already impeached. This article is about her being convicted in the impeachment trial. The post title also doesn't match with the article title which more correctly states that she's been ousted.

Technically, she wasn't impeached. But the way impeachment process works in SK, once the process begins, you are no longer able to function as president. So 'effectively', she was already impeached. Obviously I'm the one being pedantic. lol.

Impeachment is the bringing of charges.

Re: South Korean President Impeached

#50
post #46
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My cousin is a historian of Korea, and well, Korean herself. She says this president is like Korea's GWB. Shamelessly very right wing, a lot of gaffes related to speech and behavior. There are going to be a lot of happy people tonight.

sorry, but what's GWB stands for?

George W. Bush
Post reply on HN