41–50 of 207 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
In short...No. https://www.popehat.com/2016/11/06/private-porn-shoots-brill...
TL;DR: Very long and pretty offensive post that boils down to "because the courts aren't stupid and can probably tell the difference and by the way there are some specific legal requirement that when making porn you need to cross-reference IDs and you're probably not doing it".
Ummm, so shoot a video of the playing video. Or hack into the display circuitry. With that, you could stream a copy somewhere, even if both parties were present.
As always, the only way to be certain your genitals wont be on the internet is to not film them. But then again.... that's not fun.
It seems like a good idea, but won't work. I can't imagine two horny teens like: M: Show me something hot baby F: Sure! But please install that app to take all the nececary security precautions before we proceed with our sexting... This will gain traction among camgirls and other people that produce private porn (I just invented that term because I don't know how one would call porn distributed on an individual basis…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What did you expect?
I expected my colleagues to respect the things I do in private and realize I'm just human. And at the very least, if they were going to publicly respond, I'd have expected them to compliment me instead.
Hope you found a better job and colleagues after that.
Ummm, so shoot a video of the playing video. Or hack into the display circuitry. With that, you could stream a copy somewhere, even if both parties were present.
The app does not protect from malicious partners, it just makes sure videos are still secure if one of the phones is stolen or lost. I even think there should be a feature to backup your key to your computer or your other phone.
(Edit: Not a new idea, certainly, but well executed so far.)
in my opinion this is one way to do it but prevents me from having a kind of "library" with videos to share with my partner.
how about a shared library that is watchable until access is revoked by one party?
there's also the question about sharing videos with a person that's not present (i.e. long distance relationship).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean, that's obvious, right? And yet, this solution still provides a dramatic increase in security for its users. Normally, files "exist by default", and will continue to do so forever. You have to take deliberate action to delete them. But here, files are effectively "destroyed by default", and can only be accessed via: 1. Consent of both parties. 2. One of the parties going out of their way to make a deliberate c…
I guess you are right, but I think if this solution became mainstream people would do a backup as soon as they have access. This solution will give some false security and some extra security by luck and antagonist incompetence. It won't make that much of a difference.
Ummm, so shoot a video of the playing video. Or hack into the display circuitry. With that, you could stream a copy somewhere, even if both parties were present.
Ask for frontal camera access, detect recording devices.
And again, it is a client app, assume it would be modified by a malicious party.
Just admit the problem is not possible to solve.