> Some had already been irritated when “professional” managers had been hired over their teams with reportedly more stock than the early engineers had That right there is a huge warning sign that they're not valued well and that they never were.
But are you implying that no VP should ever be hired over the early engineers? I can imagine numerous situations where doing just that would provide value to the engineers and the company. And an experienced VP, even if expensive, can be a bargain if they've "done this before".