At a former job someone sent a completely inane email asking about something personal to an HR email list or all people in the company, about 21,000 people. Why does such an email list even exist? For some kind of HR emergency? Aren't there other emergency messaging systems that could be more effective?
At my company, certain lists can only be used by certain people to prevent exactly this sort of thing.
When I’m Mistakenly on an Email Chain, Should I Reply All Asking to Be Removed?
41–46 of 46 posts
Re: When I’m Mistakenly on an Email Chain, Should I Reply All Asking to Be Removed?
#42Relevant Wikipedia page, since the article is completely lacking in historical context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_storm "On 14 October 1997, a Microsoft employee noticed that they were on an as-yet unknown email distribution list 'Bedlam DL3', and emailed the list asking to be removed. This list contained approximately a quarter of the company's employees, 13,000 email addresses. Other users replied to the…
Re: When I’m Mistakenly on an Email Chain, Should I Reply All Asking to Be Removed?
#43This is purely anecdotal, but I am seeing far fewer replyallpocalypses than I did 10-15 years ago. Has something changed, like better server or client email software? Or perhaps admins and users are more savvy about avoiding this kind of behavior? (Maybe I've just been lucky to not have to deal with one of these for several years.)
I've seen maybe 1 a year over the past 5 years. The best ones are the ones that are sent out by accident, like, cc'ing in the distribution list to EVERY employee by mistake. I love it and hate it, I find it laughable that it just keeps on going, but it makes me sad that some humans cannot grasp what they are doing, nor learn from the example, and this is in huge global organisations too, full of supposedly profession…
Re: When I’m Mistakenly on an Email Chain, Should I Reply All Asking to Be Removed?
#44Relevant Wikipedia page, since the article is completely lacking in historical context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_storm "On 14 October 1997, a Microsoft employee noticed that they were on an as-yet unknown email distribution list 'Bedlam DL3', and emailed the list asking to be removed. This list contained approximately a quarter of the company's employees, 13,000 email addresses. Other users replied to the…
And because they were dogfooding Exchange server they ended up fixing several bugs: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/exchange/2004/04/08/me-t... A net plus for Microsoft, I would say.
Seems like they added a limit instead of fixing the actual problem.
Re: When I’m Mistakenly on an Email Chain, Should I Reply All Asking to Be Removed?
#45This is purely anecdotal, but I am seeing far fewer replyallpocalypses than I did 10-15 years ago. Has something changed, like better server or client email software? Or perhaps admins and users are more savvy about avoiding this kind of behavior? (Maybe I've just been lucky to not have to deal with one of these for several years.)
I think in general overuse of "reply all" has been publicly shamed in recent years. Internet etiquette has evolved past sending chain mail office jokes.
Re: When I’m Mistakenly on an Email Chain, Should I Reply All Asking to Be Removed?
#46Relevant Wikipedia page, since the article is completely lacking in historical context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_storm "On 14 October 1997, a Microsoft employee noticed that they were on an as-yet unknown email distribution list 'Bedlam DL3', and emailed the list asking to be removed. This list contained approximately a quarter of the company's employees, 13,000 email addresses. Other users replied to the…
One time someone figured out you could send an email to everyone in the university network with one command as everyone was in a Gmail group. That person started an email chain that lasted a few months.