Earlier quoted context omitted.
They no longer own them. They were spun during the housecleaning before the Alphabet announcement.
Yep, though they also soon after made a further investment in Niantic. It may sound bizarre at first, but there might be good reasons why they did that. For instance, Nintendo might've been less likely to team up with a wholly Google-owned Niantic. (purely speculation on my part) https://nianticlabs.com/blog/niantic-tpc-nintendo/
Pokemon Go is a huge security risk
41–50 of 269 posts
Re: Pokemon Go is a huge security risk
#42And just like that I will never sign in with Google anywhere ever again. I just assumed that an app couldn't grant itself full permissions without notifying me, but now I can see why that might not be the case since they are free to present whatever UI they want in app. In my dream world Google would revoke Niantic's API access forever in order to make an example out of them. Maybe, eventually, if they can prove that…
> I just assumed that an app couldn't grant itself full permissions without notifying me, but now I can see why that might not be the case since they are free to present whatever UI they want in app. Is that the case? Doesn't this still require going through the standard prompts?
Re: Pokemon Go is a huge security risk
#43Doesn't Google OWN Niantic? So now Google has access to our Google data? Don't see the issue.
Even if they were still owned by Google, a compromised phone with Pokemon Go has a nice juicy access token with admin rights to your account to siphon off.
Re: Pokemon Go is a huge security risk
#44On Android 6.0 I got the correct permissions dialog and I was able to select what the app sees and what it can do. Is this just me?
Re: Pokemon Go is a huge security risk
#45It appears to be the iOS version only that's doing this, according to this article:
http://9to5google.com/2016/07/11/psa-pokemon-go-full-access-...
Re: Pokemon Go is a huge security risk
#46I don't see any access granted to Pokemon Go (it's not even listed) in the "Apps Connected to your Account" page: https://security.google.com/settings/security/permissions I am running on a Nexus 6 and signed in with my Google Account when I first launched the app. Try revoking access and see what happens. Worst case, it might ask you to sign in again.
Re: Pokemon Go is a huge security risk
#47Re: Pokemon Go is a huge security risk
#48And just like that I will never sign in with Google anywhere ever again. I just assumed that an app couldn't grant itself full permissions without notifying me, but now I can see why that might not be the case since they are free to present whatever UI they want in app. In my dream world Google would revoke Niantic's API access forever in order to make an example out of them. Maybe, eventually, if they can prove that…
> I just assumed that an app couldn't grant itself full permissions without notifying me, but now I can see why that might not be the case since they are free to present whatever UI they want in app. Is that the case? Doesn't this still require going through the standard prompts?
Re: Pokemon Go is a huge security risk
#49When something is free to play, and involves you walking around with geo services and a camera on, you and your data are the product.
This is just massive data collection disguised as a video game.
Re: Pokemon Go is a huge security risk
#50Caveat: I've seen a number of players state or imply that playing this game has been the first decent exercise they've had in years. Lack of exercise is a far greater threat to your well-being than having your Google account hacked, so if that's what it takes, go ahead and play the game anyway.
This is by no means universally true. Plenty of people get enough exercise outside of the app, and plenty of people have Google accounts for which compromise could be very significant.
It should at the very least be disclosed in the OAuth flow that I'm giving away admin rights to the app. Facebook's flow won't even let me give away my email address without an explicit decision to do so. The current silent-but-deadly flow is inexcusably risky.