Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there any research that show being peer reviewed in fact makes a difference? General speaking, I would think research should just speak for itself.
Generally speaking, you think... well that's nice. Meanwhile, in the world of the scientific method, the issue is that everyone needs to know that you didn't just write something down for fun or profit. If your results can't be replicated... thbbpt.
Study finds women are responsible for half of some online abuse on Twitter in UK
41–50 of 99 posts
Re: Study finds women are responsible for half of some online abuse on Twitter in UK
#42> When an article makes a politically correct claim: "Yeah I totally feel this is true, this one time [insert anecdote here]" > When an article makes a not-so politically correct claim: "Well it's not peer reviewed / look at the paper that's publishing it / this is the wrong definition / headline is misleading / [insert criticism not related to the claim]"
Re: Study finds women are responsible for half of some online abuse on Twitter in UK
#43Re: Study finds women are responsible for half of some online abuse on Twitter in UK
#44I'd like to know what percentage of online abuse was directed at women. My hunch would have been 50/50 for dealing it out, but I am not so sure the split is even for taking it.
The article does link to one investigation from The Guardian about abusive comments left on articles written by journalists whose genders are known.
Eg. I saw huge numbers of comments deleted for saying a lot of redditors turned against Ellen Pao because of the perception that she sacked Victoria Taylor. Which doesn't seem abusive to me.
Re: Study finds women are responsible for half of some online abuse on Twitter in UK
#45A woman calling another a whore is misogyny? Being against promiscuity is misogyny?
Being against female promiscuity while praising or ignoring male promiscuity is definitely misogyny. Edit: Additionally, being against both in the current society is, while not necessarily misogynist in itself, contributing to a misogynistic society - there's many more people who will speak up to tell a man that the weird-ass person who told them they're bad for being promiscuous is wrong then would tell a woman the…
Re: Study finds women are responsible for half of some online abuse on Twitter in UK
#46Honestly though, equating "online abuse" to some name calling on Twitter is totally disingenuous. What about harassment and rape threats and doxing and swatting?
don't worry, females are probably responsible for half of that other stuff too.
Re: Study finds women are responsible for half of some online abuse on Twitter in UK
#47The title should probably reflect the fact that the study focuses specifically on Tweets containing the words "slut" and "whore"
You forgot the word "rape". It was actually "rape", "slut" and "whore"
> Women are responsible for half of all misogynistic Tweets
> using the words "slut and whore", a new study has found.
?
Re: Study finds women are responsible for half of some online abuse on Twitter in UK
#48The title should probably reflect the fact that the study focuses specifically on Tweets containing the words "slut" and "whore"
You forgot the word "rape". It was actually "rape", "slut" and "whore"
Re: Study finds women are responsible for half of some online abuse on Twitter in UK
#49> When an article makes a politically correct claim: "Yeah I totally feel this is true, this one time [insert anecdote here]" > When an article makes a not-so politically correct claim: "Well it's not peer reviewed / look at the paper that's publishing it / this is the wrong definition / headline is misleading / [insert criticism not related to the claim]"
Given the forum I'm surprised nobody has cited pg's pyramid yet, which is very relevant here.
Re: Study finds women are responsible for half of some online abuse on Twitter in UK
#50Why wouldn't they frame the title as "Men and women are equally responsible for misogynistic tweets" instead of singling out women?