Live data from Hacker News

Hello, This Is London Rising: 3D Printing Maps from LIDAR Data

aeracode.org

41–43 of 43 posts

Re: Hello, This Is London Rising: 3D Printing Maps from LIDAR Data

#41
post #24
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What are the available data sets for Pgh?

That's a good question. Not sure!

Best I could find right now: Lidar point cloud data

http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/topogeo/pamap/lidar/index.htm#cl...

Looks like Allegheny county was done in 2006.

What is nice about the point cloud data is that they classified each point as ground, road, water, etc

Re: Hello, This Is London Rising: 3D Printing Maps from LIDAR Data

#42
post #39
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Using clever hollow boxes can bring the prices down significantly: http://www.shapeways.com/product/PCVV6V9G2/y-garn-relief

It's still pricey. Making it hollow only helps if it's tall. For color 3D printing, the material is gypsum powder (well, there is CMYK filament now, but I haven't looked into it much). You need considerably thicker walls, etc. Furthermore, the cost is as heavily influenced by machine space as by the amount of material used. For example, this was ~$100. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/joferkington/scipy2015-3d_... I…

I just found and watched your SciPy talk. The 3d-printed geology puzzle is really cool!

Yeah, the British print is basically the bottomless box you show at 15:16, but with much thinner walls - I don't have it anymore but I'd say theirs are about .3 millimeter thick. I suppose that's also why you paid three times more.

Since they don't have a bottom lid, they apply their bottom texture underneath the top.

How difficult do you think it would be to clip the print along a border, e.g. the border of Alaska?

Re: Hello, This Is London Rising: 3D Printing Maps from LIDAR Data

#43
post #42
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's still pricey. Making it hollow only helps if it's tall. For color 3D printing, the material is gypsum powder (well, there is CMYK filament now, but I haven't looked into it much). You need considerably thicker walls, etc. Furthermore, the cost is as heavily influenced by machine space as by the amount of material used. For example, this was ~$100. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/joferkington/scipy2015-3d_... I…

I just found and watched your SciPy talk. The 3d-printed geology puzzle is really cool! Yeah, the British print is basically the bottomless box you show at 15:16, but with much thinner walls - I don't have it anymore but I'd say theirs are about .3 millimeter thick. I suppose that's also why you paid three times more. Since they don't have a bottom lid, they apply their bottom texture underneath the top. How difficul…

Thanks!

I erred on the side of too thick walls instead of too thin, as I was a bit worried about durability. They're thicker than they need to be, though. It would definitely drop costs to make them thinner.

As far as clipping along an arbitrary border, it shouldn't be difficult. I haven't actually made a model with a non-square border yet, but I've been meaning to for awhile. I probably won't have time to in the next few months, though. If you give it a try, let me know how it goes!

Post reply on HN