Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks! I'll try to add one later this week, I've been meaning to :)
That would be really great! It's always a pity when this happens: - I read a great article. - I have a look at the rest of the blog, seeing more interesting articles. - I see that the posting frequency is low. [1] - I want to add it to my QuiteRSS reader, but there is no Atom/RSS feed. [1] Which is actually a very good sign! Daily posters are inevitably posting mostly crap, and I'm too tired of such blogs to pick out…
SSH for Fun and Profit
41–50 of 76 posts
Re: SSH for Fun and Profit
#42Re: SSH for Fun and Profit
#43It's interesting that "The transport protocol doesn’t cover who sends their banner first". It'd be good if I could configure my server to keep quiet until the client identifies itself as an SSH client. I run it on an unusual port and it gets scanned frequently. sshguard helps but I'd prefer it wasn't announcing to any client that it is an ssh server.
Re: SSH for Fun and Profit
#44It's interesting that "The transport protocol doesn’t cover who sends their banner first". It'd be good if I could configure my server to keep quiet until the client identifies itself as an SSH client. I run it on an unusual port and it gets scanned frequently. sshguard helps but I'd prefer it wasn't announcing to any client that it is an ssh server.
Re: SSH for Fun and Profit
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11608610 and marked it off-topic.
Thanks! Hint to all who participated in that ugly thread: The inital comments were bad, but I found it even worse to see how many people engaged this, making that ugly thread larger and larger. It became so large that it finally displaced all the good, on-topic comments! If you really want to show respect for the author, just downvote + flag the ugly comments, and be done with it. Then, go on and use your time to pos…
Re: SSH for Fun and Profit
#46It'd be nice to be gender neutral :)
While talking in a context of a specific post, written by a male?
Re: SSH for Fun and Profit
#47Re: SSH for Fun and Profit
#48It'd be nice to be gender neutral :)
Re: SSH for Fun and Profit
#49Re: SSH for Fun and Profit
#50It'd be nice to be gender neutral :)
Really? While talking in a context of a specific post, written by a male?
Since the specific context matters to you, would you now suggest the parent of this thread then change the pronoun to "she" instead?