Earlier quoted context omitted.
At the top of his follow on article he says it isn't good for server applications, but he'd use it for client side.
Yeah, here's the quote: "(Note, long after I wrote this entry: I think OCaml has some fairly fundamental problems that keep it from being a first choice for server-side development. If I were to use it for anything, it would be as a substitute for C++ in delivering client-side executable/GUI programs, e.g. for Windows systems. And I still think it's a really cool language.)" Anyone know what he's referring to?
http://steve.yegge.googlepages.com/when-polymorphism-fails
Note that like many of the alleged deficiencies of OCaml, this was a compromise for performance.