Without any concrete evidence or cases, the general description of a problem in this article is not very convincing. Software maintenance itself is not an anti-pattern. Instead, what is described is a situation of product/project mismanagement. > ... software is not considered complete when it's first released. I don't know where this assumption comes from. > Governments often use two anti-patterns... (2) moving to r…
"... software is not considered complete when it's first released."
The author was probably meaning "finished" instead of "complete", which gives a different meaning more in line with the article.