Earlier quoted context omitted.
The City is one small area where hardly anyone actually lives.
Approximately 7,000 residents [1], but over 400,000 employees. [2] [1] http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/services/environment-and-plan... [2] http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/business/economic-research-an...
London vs San Francisco – back and forth
41–50 of 132 posts
Re: London vs San Francisco – back and forth
#42Re: London vs San Francisco – back and forth
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Literally nobody lives there (well, 7000 people do, out of a city of 8.5 million - 0.08%)
But people still commute there right? This is the point i'm trying to make, No one (and by that I man a small minority) lives in the city centre because it is too expensive. Applies to any major city on Earth which has suburbs. I imagine the population during the day swells more than 100 fold...
Re: London vs San Francisco – back and forth
#44I currently live in London and have never lived in SF but have travelled every year for GDC (games developer conf) for 1 week a year. I tend to agree with the author. The place is lovely, it's almost like a heaven on earth with almost all ameneties, temperatures and people within a 3h driving time from SF, but for some reason London with it's grey grimey and dirty history has more appeal. Perhaps it's the fact that y…
Do you ever get acclimated to the constant soggyness / dampness, the mugginess & the lack of steady bright sunlight even if you were born & raised there ?
Especially when you have to live in such small quarters without ample backyards, which are puny even by SF standards.
I don't know if Seattle gets such frequent rainfall although the total rainfall might actually be higher [1]. But I couldn't live in a place enveloped with constant dampness. It just drives me nuts. Dryness is something I've to have.
[1] https://www.quora.com/Why-does-it-rain-so-often-in-London/an...
Re: London vs San Francisco – back and forth
#45Re: London vs San Francisco – back and forth
#46I wonder what a similar comparision between London and New York would be... Anyone has a good link?
https://www.quora.com/How-does-London-compare-to-New-York-Ci...
Re: London vs San Francisco – back and forth
#47I am always, always, always shocked by the homelessness (and the mental state of those poor souls) in SF. People call London a dirty, unfriendly city but I've NEVER gotten any trouble from any of the homeless people in London apart form the usual begging, yet in SF its pretty much guaranteed you're going to get hassled/shouted-at/shoved/threatened by one of the homeless people once or twice per visit as you just go about your business.
I was considering moving to SF to work a while back. Housing is not cheap for sure, it is probably around about the same as London ... except in London if you pay $4000/month you dont get a vagrant shitting on your doorstep.
It is a genuinely shocking situation in SF. I am permanently shocked by the homelessness. It is terrible but no one seems to want/be able to do anything about it.
Re: London vs San Francisco – back and forth
#48I moved here with my wife from the UK on a H1-B a few years ago now. Three weeks ago we drove (less than 1hr) to Stinson Beach, spent all day hiking the hills, spectacular views of the Bay, the City and the Farallon Islands in the distance. Two weeks ago we drove to Monterey, took a Whale Watching boat ride for a few quid. We spent an hour watching a group of Orca hunt Sea Lion a couple hundred feet away. Last weeken…
Re: London vs San Francisco – back and forth
#49I have stayed in London for around 1 year. It's lovely. How easy it is to find work in London (for a Canadian)?
Re: London vs San Francisco – back and forth
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're not saying Africa isn't diverse, they're saying if SF is diverse, then Oakland is REALLY diverse (aka Africa)
It all depends on what you mean by "diverse" really. In some circles, it seems to be a code word for "not white people" as if white people are all the same.