Introducing GIF search on Twitter
41–50 of 97 posts
Re: Introducing GIF search on Twitter
#42GIPHY is dealing with gif files, which are much larger and less efficient bandwidth-wise than silent webm videos, such as those peddled by Gfycat. Why on earth would GIPHY be the way to go instead of a company looking to improve the paradigm? From a technology perspective, dealing in GIF at this obnoxious volume will be needlessly expensive and difficult to scale. Perhaps GIPHY has convinced VCs that they are a new m…
Re: Introducing GIF search on Twitter
#43Re: Introducing GIF search on Twitter
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Viewing a gif or mp4 is much more lightweight on mobile than a youtube video.
YouTube regularly transcodes all uploaded content into several different varieties of MP4 container. If you're on iOS, then all videos you watch on YouTube are MP4s.
Re: Introducing GIF search on Twitter
#45How is what GIPHY is doing not just plain copyright infringement? I get the "search Engine" spiel, though questionable, on their site. But there is no attribution on Twitter/Slack etc.
Don't gifs come under fair usage mostly? Can't claim a 5 second clip of a show/movie is copyright infringement
Re: Introducing GIF search on Twitter
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
The difference is, that clip art company was directly selling a product. Make a collection of clipart, customers pay money.
I guess your critique is that Giphy doesn't have a clear, announced monetization strategy? That sounds fair. I haven't done any research on the company, but that seemed vague in their recent funding announcement/valuation. However, I think it's fair to say that Giphy has created something people want to use. Anecdotally, their Slack integration is very popular in the channels I frequent. Maybe the lack of public mone…
a. Business centered around an utterly frivolous endeavor
b. Seemingly far more employees than necessary to support (a)
c. Many millions of dollars raised in the pursuit of (a) and (b)
You're absolutely correct that people want to use it. But they sure as hell aren't gonna pay directly for it or put up with ads. This is not a business made to last. I know it, you know it, we all know it. Yet there are people out there willing to toss $55M into this folly.
Re: Introducing GIF search on Twitter
#47It's funny that Twitter is doing a GIF search because Twitter encodes GIFs as MP4s for bandwidth/performance reasons: http://blog.embed.ly/post/89265229166/what-twitter-isnt-tell... I am assuming from this announcement that Giphy's Series C pitch deck was just one slide saying "we have a partnership with Twitter; give us money."
And you need to click a blue play button to play it - not in gif spirit at all! Also it can only be saved as a video, which is likely terribly compressed from the original gif. By the way, Tumblr had this feature for ages: even the icon is completely identical. [1] [1] http://i.imgur.com/v59afJb.png
Re: Introducing GIF search on Twitter
#48Sometimes I worry that our descendants many centuries from now will refer to this period of history as, "The Moronic Age."
Re: Introducing GIF search on Twitter
#49> “GIPHY delivers real-time GIFs as they happen, helping to power Twitter’s live commentary and conversation,” says Alex Chung, founder and CEO of GIPHY. Someone built a 30+ person company around animated GIFs. And they say there isn't a bubble...
They're rehosting loads of copyrighted content, too.
Re: Introducing GIF search on Twitter
#50I don't understand why they'd choose this particular feature? Which group of users is this for?
Millennials. That is not a snarky response.
I really prefer gifs to all these goofy icons and odd emoji (still use thumbs up etc, just not the poop and other odd ones).
I use Line App for chat with a group for a game I play, and they all love those stickers and emojis. Most of the time I don't even register what it is, and move on - gifs are a bit more eye catching and usually more poignant.