Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there a mirror? My corporate firewall is blocking your link.
Does Google cache work in that case? http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ZFFaYjV...
Trillions in Bad Loans May Sap World Economy for a Long Time
41–50 of 82 posts
Re: Trillions in Bad Loans May Sap World Economy for a Long Time
#42Why not forgive the loans? The negative affect of debt on people's capacity to contribute to the world economy is high, and I think it stands to reason that people would contribute more for the duration of paying off their loan if the loan wasn't hanging over their head. The banks would scream bloody murder, obviously, but their slack policies got us into this mess in the first place. The intention is to throw people…
This is a survey: http://mappingignorance.org/2013/03/20/experiments-in-fairne...
The seminal experiment is Kahneman around 1986. I fail at finding a good treatise on it. But here's this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prospect_theory
And as applied directly to econ: http://www.econ.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:ffffffff-9758-127f-0000-00005...
The banks are simply our agents in this. Roughly, other "innovations" have made debt more dangerous over time. My paltry understanding is that one of the uses of inflation is to erode the value of debt.
We don't have meaningful inflation any more. And yes, I relaize how bizarre that sounds. But: http://www.interfluidity.com/v2/3212.html
Something terrible has happened to the tradeoff between the balance sheet and cash flow. A really crummy analogy is position v. velocity on quantum realms; as competitiveness has escalated, we get to where the trade between them is more severe. Also IMO, much as wages have stagnated, the value of capital goods has also.
Re: Trillions in Bad Loans May Sap World Economy for a Long Time
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Why not forgive the loans? The idea of a "debt jubilee" is definitely something that's been discussed before by economists and philosophers. One big issue is that there are other people on the other side of those debt cancellations that would get hurt. For example, it's terrible that young adults have massive college loans to pay back. Some are kicking around the idea to forgive those loans. But there are also credi…
>But there are also creditors as well. Think of grandparents who have a 401k for retirement. Through the interconnectedness of the financial system, a component of their retirement income will depend on payback of those "bad" college loans. Do most 401Ks really invest in student debt?
It's trillions of dollars, and every penny of it is held as an asset on someone's balance sheet. Do you think it's confined to "greedy bankers"?
Re: Trillions in Bad Loans May Sap World Economy for a Long Time
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Why not forgive the loans? The idea of a "debt jubilee" is definitely something that's been discussed before by economists and philosophers. One big issue is that there are other people on the other side of those debt cancellations that would get hurt. For example, it's terrible that young adults have massive college loans to pay back. Some are kicking around the idea to forgive those loans. But there are also credi…
>But there are also creditors as well. Think of grandparents who have a 401k for retirement. Through the interconnectedness of the financial system, a component of their retirement income will depend on payback of those "bad" college loans. Do most 401Ks really invest in student debt?
Re: Trillions in Bad Loans May Sap World Economy for a Long Time
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Why not forgive the loans? The idea of a "debt jubilee" is definitely something that's been discussed before by economists and philosophers. One big issue is that there are other people on the other side of those debt cancellations that would get hurt. For example, it's terrible that young adults have massive college loans to pay back. Some are kicking around the idea to forgive those loans. But there are also credi…
>But there are also creditors as well. Think of grandparents who have a 401k for retirement. Through the interconnectedness of the financial system, a component of their retirement income will depend on payback of those "bad" college loans. Do most 401Ks really invest in student debt?
https://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=SLM+Major+Holders
Much of the other 75% is I'm sure also distributed into many other common mutual funds that are used in people's 401k plans.
Re: Trillions in Bad Loans May Sap World Economy for a Long Time
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Imagine you're a bank calculating the interest rate to offer on a loan. Do you think that rate will be lower or higher if you believe there are circumstances wherein the government would unilaterally allow your borrower to cease payment? Obviously, if the government could be metaphysically certain of the loans that would never return another penny and only cancel those, there's no net loss to the bank. But there's no…
This is why in days of yore there was something called collateral. Loan goes bad, you take the collateral, maybe take a loss and move on. Now banks think they can get rid of that concept too. They want loans to be insured by governments so there will never be defaults and they can simply mint money?
Yeah, and in the most recent cases that was somebody's home, for which nabbing that collateral was controversial.
>Now banks think they can get rid of that concept too.
Banks are pretty good at assessing loan risk. You don't think so? Go try to get a small business or unsecured loan.
Re: Trillions in Bad Loans May Sap World Economy for a Long Time
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Imagine you're a bank calculating the interest rate to offer on a loan. Do you think that rate will be lower or higher if you believe there are circumstances wherein the government would unilaterally allow your borrower to cease payment? Obviously, if the government could be metaphysically certain of the loans that would never return another penny and only cancel those, there's no net loss to the bank. But there's no…
This is why in days of yore there was something called collateral. Loan goes bad, you take the collateral, maybe take a loss and move on. Now banks think they can get rid of that concept too. They want loans to be insured by governments so there will never be defaults and they can simply mint money?
The end result of the monster that became blew up in 2008, after people took it far, far, far too far.
The hard problems are hard, mainly because you can't see the effect of an action until it's far too late.
Calomiris/Haber wrote a book explaining this. Recommended.
We can resort to a sort of grumpy, Congregationalist/Calvinist mentality but then stuff goes undone and people are poorer. Value should come from value, not suffering.
Re: Trillions in Bad Loans May Sap World Economy for a Long Time
#48Re: Trillions in Bad Loans May Sap World Economy for a Long Time
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Imagine you're a bank calculating the interest rate to offer on a loan. Do you think that rate will be lower or higher if you believe there are circumstances wherein the government would unilaterally allow your borrower to cease payment? Obviously, if the government could be metaphysically certain of the loans that would never return another penny and only cancel those, there's no net loss to the bank. But there's no…
Imagine you're a bank calculating the interest rate to offer on a loan. Do you think that rate will be lower or higher if you believe there are circumstances wherein the government would unilaterally allow your borrower to cease payment? It is unquestionably true that a debt jubilee would result in higher interest rates. It is somewhat disingenuous to spin this as a negative for people with marginal credit: you only…
6.8% represents quite a bit of risk in this environment of historically low rates. How is Argentina doing?
I mean, I agree that people will eventually "forget", but that's always with the assumption that the "last time" was some unique set of circumstances.
It's amazing to me that people still believe that the best way to reap the benefits of capitalism is to seize or extort the capital from the capital owners. Of course, everyone thinks that those capital owners are some mysterious "other", and they'll be unscathed by the wealth grab. I wonder what people would think if they were told by the government that their savings and investments were being reset to zero so some students could get a free education? Probably wouldn't be so impressed...
Re: Trillions in Bad Loans May Sap World Economy for a Long Time
#50Knowing that some of this will result in a partial economic downturn, how can the 'average investor' hedge/profit from it? Not in a 'Big Short' sort of way, just using this as an investment strategy for the layman. Any ideas?
buy gold.
buy bitcoin? :-)