The worrisome thing here is that batman outfits and swords are used as proof of the "boy" identity and pink princess stuff as proof of the "girl" identity. This is complete crap - gender roles are not dictated by which aisle of Toys 'R' Us you favor. I am willing to grant that the children profiled in the article aren't just in it for the toys, but the author is encouraging this perception, and I have seen more than…
I felt a level of jealousy in school because of the freedom boys had (ex. girls were made to stay indoors to learn where babies came from, whereas boys were sent out to play) but never wished for a "winky".
I have also loathed pink from childhood and fashion crap. I see a little girl's room looking like a Peptobismal explosion and I want to take a flame thrower to it. And anything sparkly. And anything encrusted with fake gems. And anything cutsy really.
I see these assemblages of abhorrent things being passed off as gender "girl" and it's very hard to separate my loathing for cutsy pink crap, and the transgirl wearing the cutsy pink crap. It may come off as transphobia, but I sort of hate non-trans women wearing crap like that too.