Live data from Hacker News

Biggest Diamond in More Than a Century Unearthed in Botswana

bloomberg.com

41–45 of 45 posts

Re: Biggest Diamond in More Than a Century Unearthed in Botswana

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How generous.

Its about what corporate taxes are many places. Why would it be different there?

Corporate taxes are separate. 10% is the royalty the Botswanan government charges for precious stones. Any taxes are on top of that.

Re: Biggest Diamond in More Than a Century Unearthed in Botswana

#42

We have reached levels of unfathomable wealth. >Last week, Hong Kong billionaire Joseph Lau paid 48.6 million Swiss francs ($48.4 million) at Sotheby’s in Geneva for a 12.03-carat blue diamond, the most spent on a jewel at auction. A day earlier, he paid 28.7 million francs for a 16.08-carat pink diamond. Both purchases were for his 7 year-old daughter, his office said.

Seems like the hip thing for a multi-billionaire to do would be to buy the whole stone and leave it uncut, just so they could have the largest diamond in the world.

Re: Biggest Diamond in More Than a Century Unearthed in Botswana

#43
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right you are... The people of Botswana don't even rate a mention in the article, they're likely not going to see a single dime of the proceeds which will be in the many tens of millions of US$.

Botswana is an upper-middle-income economy with a freer press and lower corruption than a number of European countries. Their level of corruption is slightly worse than that of France, and way better than most South or East European country (source: https://www.transparency.org/country/#BWA ; http://www.heritage.org/index/country/botswana ). Also, they are one of the largest producers of rough diamonds in the world,…

Thank you for that information, that totally changed my view on the situation in Botswana. Reading up on Africa from time to time and I completely missed this.

Re: Biggest Diamond in More Than a Century Unearthed in Botswana

#44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it is value extracted, not value added, and because the receivers of the majority of that value are in a position to extract that value by virtue of having historically exploited Botswana. So the larger part of the value will be removed from the country rather than that it will become part of the local economy it will become part of our economy.

That could be, but for the jobs, transportation, development and taxes they pay, right? The benefit to Botswana is somewhat diminished by having the diamond shipped overseas. But lets be honest: there is no real industrial/commercial value to this diamond at all; it is simply a trophy.

Diamond mining is highly mechanized. There definitely are local workers but fortunately it is no longer as labor intensive as it used to be (that's bad because fewer jobs, but it is also good because those jobs were super dangerous and very low pay anyway).

Agreed that it is mostly a trophy.

Re: Biggest Diamond in More Than a Century Unearthed in Botswana

#45
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right you are... The people of Botswana don't even rate a mention in the article, they're likely not going to see a single dime of the proceeds which will be in the many tens of millions of US$.

Botswana is an upper-middle-income economy with a freer press and lower corruption than a number of European countries. Their level of corruption is slightly worse than that of France, and way better than most South or East European country (source: https://www.transparency.org/country/#BWA ; http://www.heritage.org/index/country/botswana ). Also, they are one of the largest producers of rough diamonds in the world,…

That is great to hear, thank you for educating my stupid sarcastic ass.
Post reply on HN