Such container

Post by r0naa » Wed, Oct 07, 2015, 2:35 PM UTC

yoodenvranx wrote: post #23

creamyhorror wrote: post #3

I hate to admit that I mindlessly upvote doge-related submissions and comments. Very shaem

I would have almost upvoted this submission, but as it is often the case, the title on HN is complete meaningless garbage. A much better title would be "Such container - an attempt to document the ins and outs of containers on Linux.". This way I would instantly know what the article is about... I wish there would be some way to add a tldr to the title. This is really the one thing I hate about HN nowadays. Usually a…

Post by peterwwillis » Wed, Oct 07, 2015, 2:43 PM UTC

Post by temo4ka » Wed, Oct 07, 2015, 2:47 PM UTC

afandian wrote: post #2

This is a subject I really want to know about. But the presentation of this this page is (no better word for it) obnoxious. I wonder why the author did it. Annoyingly the 'reader' feature of Safari doesn't work on this page.

    var getFont = function(url) {
        var link = document.createElement('link');
        link.rel='stylesheet';
        link.type='text/css';
        link.href = url;
        document.head.appendChild(link);
    }

    getFont('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans|Roboto')

    var sheet = (function() {
        var style = document.createElement('style');
        document.head.appendChild(style);
        return style.sheet;
    })();

    sheet.insertRule('body { font: 400 16px/24px Roboto,sans-serif!important; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; }', 0);

Post by wingerlang » Wed, Oct 07, 2015, 3:57 PM UTC

reitanqild wrote: post #31

hackeraccount wrote: post #10

D+ for the presentation but the content gets an A. It really is a nice overview of the options without being overly prescriptive about what option to pick.

Disagree. Reminds me of the old, cute (and still useful) internet (geocities, web rings etc).