Live data from Hacker News

Someone bought 'Google.com' from Google for one minute

finance.yahoo.com

41–50 of 100 posts

Re: Someone bought 'Google.com' from Google for one minute

#41

Definitely a bug in Google domains. The real one expires 9/14/2020. https://who.is/whois/google.com/

Yea, but if Google says you own google.com, how 'unreal' is your claim?

Registrars can say whatever they want, it doesn't mean anything until the domain is properly listed in the TLD's main database, in this case VeriSign.

Re: Someone bought 'Google.com' from Google for one minute

#42
post #38

Apparently this happened in 1999 with Microsoft's Passport.com as well [1], and again later with hotmail.co.uk [2]. While I understand that snafus like this can happen, I don't understand why the new owner would simply hand back the domain for essentially no compensation (especially in the case of hotmail.co.uk - this appeared to be a clean transfer of an expired domain). If they let the domain expire, it's fair game…

If a company can reasonably show they own a trademark for a name in a region and should be awarded a domain, registrars will give away the domain. There has been plenty of cases where even old domains were taken away.

[deleted]

Re: Someone bought 'Google.com' from Google for one minute

#43
post #42
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If a company can reasonably show they own a trademark for a name in a region and should be awarded a domain, registrars will give away the domain. There has been plenty of cases where even old domains were taken away.

[deleted]

ICANN has policies in place to preempt ridiculous arguments like this.

Re: Someone bought 'Google.com' from Google for one minute

#44
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nope. The details don't match not because GP has a bad memory but because it was a separate incident. Don't be a dick.

Ah, maybe it was the passport.com incident that was mentioned in another comment. Fair enough!

It was the same.

http://www.doublewide.net/

Re: Someone bought 'Google.com' from Google for one minute

#45
post #42
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If a company can reasonably show they own a trademark for a name in a region and should be awarded a domain, registrars will give away the domain. There has been plenty of cases where even old domains were taken away.

[deleted]

[deleted]

Re: Someone bought 'Google.com' from Google for one minute

#46
post #38

Apparently this happened in 1999 with Microsoft's Passport.com as well [1], and again later with hotmail.co.uk [2]. While I understand that snafus like this can happen, I don't understand why the new owner would simply hand back the domain for essentially no compensation (especially in the case of hotmail.co.uk - this appeared to be a clean transfer of an expired domain). If they let the domain expire, it's fair game…

If a company can reasonably show they own a trademark for a name in a region and should be awarded a domain, registrars will give away the domain. There has been plenty of cases where even old domains were taken away.

You are not awarded a domain name simply because you hold a trademark. There is evidence that domains have been awarded to trademark holders after a UDRP hearing and the trademark holder contested the validity of the registration. Read the UDRP guidelines [0].

There is also the counterpoint of the case of Nissan Motor Co vs. Nissan Computer Corp [1] where Nissan Motors owns the trademarks but have not been granted nissan.com.

[0] https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/policy-2012-02-25-en#4 [1] http://www.internetlibrary.com/cases/lib_case292.cfm

Re: Someone bought 'Google.com' from Google for one minute

#47
post #42
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If a company can reasonably show they own a trademark for a name in a region and should be awarded a domain, registrars will give away the domain. There has been plenty of cases where even old domains were taken away.

[deleted]

[deleted]

Re: Someone bought 'Google.com' from Google for one minute

#48
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[deleted]

Whoa thanks for mention this; I've always been "logged in" to LinkedIn that I never knew you had to be logged in to see their content. That's a shame. Edit: jschmitz28 is a liar; you can access without being logged in just fine.

It is working for me now. At the time of my post, opening the link incognito redirected to the same page as when you click the "Join today" link in the top right: https://www.linkedin.com/start/join?trk=hb_join

Re: Someone bought 'Google.com' from Google for one minute

#50
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[deleted]

Whoa thanks for mention this; I've always been "logged in" to LinkedIn that I never knew you had to be logged in to see their content. That's a shame. Edit: jschmitz28 is a liar; you can access without being logged in just fine.

> jschmitz28 is a liar

Not cool. Perhaps you meant it humorously, but please don't post things like that here.

Post reply on HN