Live data from Hacker News

The case for physical media ownership

dervis.de

391–392 of 392 posts

Re: The case for physical media ownership

#391
post #390
post #329

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The vast majority of the money goes to middlemen, rights holders, investors, executives and other suited up parasites. If you want artists to make a living, you need to end shareholder capitalism, not reinforce it.

You don't get to choose how a particular movie was funded and who agreed to pay who in exchange for what.

But thanks to the brave activists in piracy groups, I get to decide whether I want to feed or starve the machine.

Re: The case for physical media ownership

#392
post #388

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You actually have to support the creators however THEY want if you want access, not however YOU want. No, I don't. > I suspect you're not actually supporting all the creators of the things you watch via piracy! I don't actually want to support most of them. The few I care about get donations.

You do if you want to be seen as a good person. You can be a bad person if you want to be.

I don't care about being seen as a good person. I do care about being a good person (at least to the extent I am able).

I don't see how copyright relates to my (or anyone's) character. You can be a good or bad person who copies files, and you can also be a good or bad person who doesn't.

Post reply on HN