Live data from Hacker News

We need a federation of forges

blog.tangled.org

391–400 of 424 posts

Re: We need a federation of forges

#391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In what sense is bluesky irrelevant in this context? It's obviously not Twitter scale, but no alternative to GitHub will be GitHub scale for a long time to come either... And it does seem to have the right feature set. Not sure which other social graph/network you could reasonably build a GitHub alternative around that would be less irrelevant....

It's largely perceived to be an ideological site. Obviously every community has its own biases and tastes, but I think Bluesky has just captured the imagination as the "left-leaning social platform." When the NYT was talking about a potential link between the WHCD shooter and Bluesky posts, that's what they referred to Bluesky as. Obviously Tangled can live completely separate from Bluesky, it doesn't even need to sh…

I wonder how much this translates to places outside the US... Bluesky being the place for everything Center-left and left of it by US standards would just make it the place for mainstream opinion in much of the EU.

Personally I found it much easier to avoid politics on Bluesky than on other platforms. Which is why it's been more sticky for me than Twitter was. And I put that down to having good feed control, and not being beholden to an algorithm that tries to keep me engaged.

Re: We need a federation of forges

#392

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep. Changing servers is easy. You just have to update the central PLC registry run by Blue Sky LLC to say which server you're hosted on now. ... wait a minute.

You're complaining that moving away from a PDS means you have to let that PDS know you're moving away? Do you understand what you're actually complaining about, or I the one who misunderstand what you're complaining about? In case you haven't read them before, the docs for migrating are here: https://atproto.com/guides/account-migration

The PLC registry

Re: We need a federation of forges

#393

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're complaining that moving away from a PDS means you have to let that PDS know you're moving away? Do you understand what you're actually complaining about, or I the one who misunderstand what you're complaining about? In case you haven't read them before, the docs for migrating are here: https://atproto.com/guides/account-migration

The PLC registry

What is it you're trying to communicate here? I know and understand what PLC is already, mind actually answering the previous questions?

Re: We need a federation of forges

#394

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes to both. An app can choose to ignore/ban some users (or even entire hosting servers if they’re specifically created for network abuse). This is similar to how any web app may choose to ignore POST requests from spammers. And yes, someone can decide to aggregate data themselves and provide an alternative app over same data with different moderation policies. In fact that’s already the case (Blacksky runs their own…

So the app is equivalent to an AP instance.

No because apps are decoupled many-to-many with hosting.

Every app can display public data from every other app because the source of truth is outside both apps (in hosting).

App owner can’t do bad things to your account other than banning you in their particular app. Other apps (even for same data) independently choose whether to show your data. So app owners are only in control over how your data is presented in their apps, not over your actual data.

Whereas in AP, each app’s moderators literally control your entire identity.

Re: We need a federation of forges

#395
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't mind VC funding as long as they aren't YC funded.

Why?

I believe YC is a organization run by bad people. Like, people who actually want to do harm to you. You can peek at Garry Tan's X to get a taste of the type of things I'm talking to.

Re: We need a federation of forges

#396

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'm not familiar with any existing federated system that would be resilient to government censorship. Usenet and Matrix are notable examples.

Usenet is, Matrix isn't. Usenet achieves this with a broadcast design - every node on the network receives every message. As a result of this and being flooded with half a petabyte of new messages per day, there are approximately 3 (three) nodes (all other providers are reselling access to one of these). The text side of Usenet is healthier, with a few gigabytes per day, and not trying to retain every message forever…

> As a result of this and being flooded with half a petabyte of new messages per day, there are approximately 3 (three) nodes (all other providers are reselling access to one of these).

You seem to be referring to a particular set of binary-focused servers. I am referring to the protocol and network design, as an example of a federated system offering resilience.

(Also, I think your numbers are wrong, but I won't quibble about those because it's the network that's relevant to this thread, not the way some people happen to be using it today.)

> Matrix isn't.

It is. Blocking or shutting down any node in the network only affects that node. Others carry on without it. Another example of a federated system offering resilience.

Re: We need a federation of forges

#397

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those were all isolated places, where you needed an account for that specific forum (whereas you can use your PDS anywhere), where that forum held your data (whereas you hold your atproto data, and we all internetwork to see the aggregate), where you were subject to the moderation decisions of that forum (whereas you have control over your PDS (but not other people's clients)). Pretty unclear what your comment is try…

Isn't this stuff we're inventing more complicated than having accounts on websites?

Fuck yes it is. Centralizing everything & owning all the data & giving users no rights is technically easy as hell. Walk in the fucking park!

It's also abjectly awful. Sites change hands, change owners, change terms of service, change moderators... sites shut down. Taking "your" content with them. To accept centralized services is technically simple but it means accepting the infinitely long timeline of social and corporate complexity, that plays out, day by day & decade by decade.

As a user it is much simpler for me to have a PDS where my data is, that I control, and manage.

And it's all my data. I don't have to manage my data across thousands of different profiles on different sites. On that hostile unstable ground I've spoken of, each of these sites evolving and devolving in their own multi-variate ways.

It's perhaps sometimes simpler to have experiences that only exist in one site. But it's much richer and more interesting when different apps can interoperate, can adversarially interoperate/competitive cooperation. I also think that for users, once you get the hang of it, the patterns of having a PDS emerge, and provide a consistency of experience across apps, where-as each site has to be learned on its own terms: it's simpler having a single sign on from your PDS, having tools you can manage all your data with. (https://pds.ls)

We have atproto experiences like the just launching Disperse that work across the different apps, that bring them together. Multiple different apps do bookmarking using the same lexion, some with their own add-ons. A single site can't give you that ability to work across systems, to work broadly. You are reduced to working on a site by site basis. That's simple until it becomes overwhelming, at which point better tools becomes simpler: having a PDS leaves the door open to making these better tools, that work more broadly, across systems. https://bsky.app/profile/quillmatiq.com/post/3mkq2hzfjn22s

Whereas you might get stuck with a complex bad app hosted on one site, with atproto your data is yours to manage and you can use whatever app you please, and those different apps can attune to different user types: users who want a rich complex app might use one app, other folks can prefer a simpler less complicated app. Not being evolutionarily handcuffed to one company's app your whole life lets everyone explore not just what us "more complicated"/simpler, but a whole range of preferences that suits the user, that better matches what the user wants, that can grow and evolve with the users and their data, in a way that the "simple" centralized system by definition cannot enable.

It's so wild to me how much I see the dual of complexity. Rich Hickey talking about complecting is spiritual holy matter to me, is deeply cherished. But I see so so so many people who use aversion to complexity as a tool to turn off thinking, to not regard the complexity: endless Chesterton's Fences, no curiosity about why the fence might be there. There's such strong swelling of dark energy to tear down destroy and berate, the smugness of those so happy to criticize ram usage or to say software is all bad now. I dunno man. It really tires me out having such shallow engagement such superficial reactions.

Personally my soul craves a deeper connection with systems, wants to engage and explore, to sift what complexity brings interestingness from that complexity which is incidental. I've written a bunch of posts in this submission what I think is so so so interesting in the inherent choices of having an Authenticated Transfer Protocol, where you can send my data around over http, or web sockets, or MoQT, or IP over avian, or tin cans and shoe string, and still have it be clear to the world that that data is mine. Very few other systems offer that. ActivityPub certainly doesn't practice that widely, maybe doesn't offer that at all. All these systems we've built assume a host that stays online forever, that owns the responsibility fully. It's wicked deeply compelling to me to march into some complexity to liberate us from this ancient bitter internet constraint. Hello & thank you, complexity.

Re: We need a federation of forges

#398

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why?

I believe YC is a organization run by bad people. Like, people who actually want to do harm to you. You can peek at Garry Tan's X to get a taste of the type of things I'm talking to.

Is Peter Thiel a good person?

Re: We need a federation of forges

#399

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's largely perceived to be an ideological site. Obviously every community has its own biases and tastes, but I think Bluesky has just captured the imagination as the "left-leaning social platform." When the NYT was talking about a potential link between the WHCD shooter and Bluesky posts, that's what they referred to Bluesky as. Obviously Tangled can live completely separate from Bluesky, it doesn't even need to sh…

I wonder how much this translates to places outside the US... Bluesky being the place for everything Center-left and left of it by US standards would just make it the place for mainstream opinion in much of the EU. Personally I found it much easier to avoid politics on Bluesky than on other platforms. Which is why it's been more sticky for me than Twitter was. And I put that down to having good feed control, and not…

It doesn't. I don't really believe this meme of the center-left and left in the US being the mainstream in the EU. It's true that certain attitudes around labor and economics are shared between the American left and more center left and center EU parties, but our stances on social issues are completely different. There's an entire fabric of multiculturalism that's present in the US that just isn't in the EU that has a very different lens. For example, the US just doesn't have anything resembling an EU-style Christian Democratic party from a social values perspective at all.

Bluesky is mostly about day-to-day American politics, which means talking about how a court ruling is bad, how Trump did something stupid, or how the current admin is corrupt. The complaint I've read from most EU folks is how American day-to-day politics takes up way too much of the site.

I was unable to turn off politics without pretty much completely nuking my feed. I tried using mute words but that ended up just turning off most of my timeline. I build a US Politics labeler that worked pretty well, but ended up in a similar effect. Content outside of the politics on the network just isn't very interesting. Pretty much none of my hobbies are well represented there except some photography, and the photography is mostly about sharing pictures (which is definitely cool) rather than talking about shooting weddings or events or street the way it tends to shake up in other photography communities.

Re: We need a federation of forges

#400

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe YC is a organization run by bad people. Like, people who actually want to do harm to you. You can peek at Garry Tan's X to get a taste of the type of things I'm talking to.

Is Peter Thiel a good person?

Not in my opinion
Post reply on HN