Live data from Hacker News

LittleSnitch for Linux

obdev.at

391–400 of 489 posts

Re: LittleSnitch for Linux

#391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then development will stop and users don't have the software anymore. If users consider this software important they should donate so they can keep using it.

How exactly is this different from payed software?

The developer isn’t accepting a job offer to develop it, they’re accepting donations. That’s literally how the software devs for Opensnitch choose to receive payment.

Re: LittleSnitch for Linux

#392
post #167

I know it sounds crazy at this point, but with popular YouTubers switching to Linux, gamers overall well-aware of Steam on Linux advantages and switching as well, plus popular software like LittleSnitch getting ported, 2026 can without irony be named as Year of Linux Desktop, right?

The year of the Linux Desktop will always be $CURRENT_YEAR + 1

To me, the year's in the past. I haven't touched Windows since 2017, and nothing bad happened to me.

But you're right, I guess for some people, there will already be a good reason not to use Linux.

Re: LittleSnitch for Linux

#393
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I run both (LS on Mac, at least), they do different things - pi.hole is a great ad blocker which applies to all of the devices on your network. Little Snitch is doing something different - it tells you every call that every app you use is making, and allows you to approve or deny each one. So, you can block telemetry for apps, or you can block certain apps from contacting certain servers, or you can just use it to wa…

To clarify, I'm aware that pihole is not intended to run on a client OS, and doesn't monitor at a process level. I'm focused on the intended effect rather than the process itself (blocking malicious/ad servers). And I think I framed my initial question incorrectly as if LS and PiHole as subtitutes. It's perfectly fine and even preferrable to use both as layered protection. I'm just thinking however when it comes for…

Yeah, if you're just looking for ad blocking, you're right, pi.hole is the better bet.

Little Snitch is intended for per-process, per-connection blocking - for example, you may need, eg, an Instagram uploader app to contact Meta's servers, but an unrelated app should not be able to (and even in the case of the hypothetical IG uploader, you can get very fine grained about the controls - media.facebook.net, not telemetry.facebook.net). In that way, LS does have some advantages over pi.hole in that space - You'd need to set up every single item that you normally get for free from a blocklist, but it gives you much finer control over what's getting blocked and much better visibility into what connections your processes are trying to make.

Again, I don't think Little Snitch is the right answer if you're looking for ad blocking specifically, and if that's the extent of your privacy concerns, pi.hole's a better bet. Little Snitch is a per-application connection monitor and firewall - it _can_ block ads, but that's not its primary purpose.

Re: LittleSnitch for Linux

#395
i have been pretty happy with opensnitch. ui improvements are always welcome although what might be really interesting would be some sort of plug-in system that allows for an agent to watch my interactions activity and the outbound connections and only flag things that seem surprising. also maybe some kind of improvement over the pop-up (maybe get rid of them entirely and add some kind of cli wrapper that allow-lists child processes).

Re: LittleSnitch for Linux

#396
post #167

I know it sounds crazy at this point, but with popular YouTubers switching to Linux, gamers overall well-aware of Steam on Linux advantages and switching as well, plus popular software like LittleSnitch getting ported, 2026 can without irony be named as Year of Linux Desktop, right?

The year of the Linux Desktop will always be $CURRENT_YEAR + 1

The year of the Linux Desktop will be powered by fusion.

Re: LittleSnitch for Linux

#397

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I read ZoneAlarm and it was like suddenly a part of my brain that went unvisited for 25 years lit up...

WinAmp skins. Alternate shells for Windows(!). Cygwin because I still played too many games to go full Linux. Yeah...

btw all versions of WinAmp + skins still work great in 2026 even on Win11 :)

Re: LittleSnitch for Linux

#398
post #167

I know it sounds crazy at this point, but with popular YouTubers switching to Linux, gamers overall well-aware of Steam on Linux advantages and switching as well, plus popular software like LittleSnitch getting ported, 2026 can without irony be named as Year of Linux Desktop, right?

kde linux may make it happen. that and command line agents that help people fix their systems.

Re: LittleSnitch for Linux

#400
post #167

I know it sounds crazy at this point, but with popular YouTubers switching to Linux, gamers overall well-aware of Steam on Linux advantages and switching as well, plus popular software like LittleSnitch getting ported, 2026 can without irony be named as Year of Linux Desktop, right?

2026 is the year of the linux phone. We need to embrace that the year of the linux desktop (2025) was successful.

According to latest Steam stats[0], Linux hit > 5% for the first time ever, so definitely successful (to some degree).

[0] https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/steam-hardware-softw...

Post reply on HN