What are people using Claws for? It is interesting to see it everywhere but I haven’t had any good ideas for using them. Anyone to share their use case? Thanks!
My favorite use so far has been giving it a copy of my Calibre library. After having it write a few scripts and a skill, I can ask it questions about any book I’m reading. This week I had it order a series internally chronological. I could use the search on my Kindle or open Calibre myself, but a Signal message is much faster when it’s already got the SQLite file right there.
Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents
391–400 of 1001 posts
Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents
#392So what is a "claw" exactly? An ai that you let loose on your email etc? And we run it in a container and use a local llm for "safety" but it has access to all our data and the web?
There are a few qualitative product experiences that make claw agents unique. One is that it relentlessly strives thoroughly to complete tasks without asking you to micromanage it. The second is that it has personality. The third is that it's artfully constructed so that it feels like it has infinite context. The above may sound purely circumstantial and frivolous. But together it's the first agent that many people w…
Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents
#393Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents
#394I still dont understand the hype for any of this claw stuff
It’s as if ChatGPT is an autonomous agent that can do anything and keeps running constantly. Most AI tools require supervision, this is the opposite. To many people, the idea of having an AI always active in the background doing whatever they want them to do is interesting.
As the person you're replying to feels, I just don't understand. All the descriptions are just random cool sounding words/phrases strung together but none of it actually providing any concrete detail of what it actually is.
Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents
#395I still dont understand the hype for any of this claw stuff
It’s as if ChatGPT is an autonomous agent that can do anything and keeps running constantly. Most AI tools require supervision, this is the opposite. To many people, the idea of having an AI always active in the background doing whatever they want them to do is interesting.
Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents
#396Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents
#397Earlier quoted context omitted.
> software to fly the drone into the person... and thats probably around somewhere out there as well. ardupilot + waypoint nav would do it for fixed locations. The camera identifies a target, gets the gps cooridnates and sets a waypoint. I would be shocked if there wasn't extensions available (maybe not officially) for flying to a "moving location". I'm in the high power rocketry hobby and the knowledge to add contro…
> a hobby that already raises eyebrows Sounds very interesting, but may I ask how this actually works as a hobby? Is it purely theoretical like analyzing and modeling, or do you build real rockets?
Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents
#398Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love this. Another way of saying it: the problem we should be focused on is not how smart the AI is getting. The problem we should be focused on is how dumb people are getting (or have been for all of eternity) and how they will facilitate and block their own chance of survival. That seems uniquely human but I'm not a ethnobiologist. A corollary to that is that the only real chance for survival is that a plurality…
> The problem we should be focused on is how dumb people are getting (or have been for all of eternity) Over the arc of time, I’m not sure that an accurate characterization is that humans have been getting dumber and dumber. If that were true, we must have been super geniuses 3000 years ago! I think what is true is that the human condition and age old questions are still with us and we’re still on the path to trying…
That's my theory, anyway.
Re: Claws are now a new layer on top of LLM agents
#399I'm impressed with how we moved from "AI is dangerous", "Skynet", "don't give AI internet access or we are doomed", "don't let AI escape" to "Hey AI, here is internet, do whatever you want".
The DoDs recent beef with Anthropic over their right to restrict how Claude can be used is revealing. > Though Anthropic has maintained that it does not and will not allow its AI systems to be directly used in lethal autonomous weapons or for domestic surveillance Autonomous AI weapons is one of the things the DoD appears to be pursuing. So bring back the Skynet people, because that’s where we apparently are. 1. http…
I really doubt that Anthropic is in any kind of position to make those decisions regardless of how they feel.