Live data from Hacker News

Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

scottrlarson.com

391–400 of 514 posts

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#391
A switch is viable for technical users but I’d still not be comfortable recommending it for family members.

It’s still a bridge too far for most

The hardware landfill issue is real though. My 70 year old dad announced he’s getting a new laptop out of the blue. Reason…this

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#392

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not to mention hardware based cheating that just implements a fully compliant USB mouse, keyboard, and HDMI setup, and DMA like https://www.dma-cheats.com/

I'm sure some jackass is going to suggest cryptographically verifying that you are using peripherals from trusted manufacturers soon.

That's physically not possible though, you could always have a device which pushes through the buttons on a genuine controller.

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#393

I think describing TPM and Secure Boot as "artificial limitations" is unfair. Many Linux distros have no problem working with both of these and they serve a valuable purpose. The problem is not that they exist or that Windows 11 supports them. It's that Microsoft pretends they are required , when they are not.

They have good reasons to be required, though: Secure Boot reduces the ability of malware to infect the bootloader. TPM gives a strong foundation for things like Passkeys.

TPM also enables things that average users care less about like DRM, but Passkeys are a good idea and having them more-secure-by-default is good for the average user (even with accidental vendor lock-in implications).

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#394

I wish there was an active dev community that could patch win10 going forward, but without access to source code for the kernel, perhaps that isn't really viable. Ideally I would want to use Linux but I also want to play games that are only supported on windows. Does using WSL help or is an outdated windows base still going to be the weakest link in the security onion?

WSL is effectively a virtual machine. The weakest link is still going to be the virtual machine host (Windows).

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#395
post #328

I wish there was an active dev community that could patch win10 going forward, but without access to source code for the kernel, perhaps that isn't really viable. Ideally I would want to use Linux but I also want to play games that are only supported on windows. Does using WSL help or is an outdated windows base still going to be the weakest link in the security onion?

WSL is unfortunately is less than ideal, not only is it rubbish (it has its own set of issues like weird networking bugs), it also doesn't mitigate any of the security vulnerabilities/bloatware/telemetry/bugs etc present in Windows. But you can always dual-boot between Windows and Linux. Just uninstall all your browsers (to mitigate risk) and other non-essential app in your Windows install, configure the firewall to…

> (it has its own set of issues like weird networking bugs)

WSL2 is mostly just a virtual machine. All of its networking bugs aren't that weird, they are pretty common networking issues you'd see from any other virtual machine configuration. Depending on what you are trying to do, switching WSL2's networking mode to "Mirrored" can be a useful way to fix networking issues by more closely aligning the VM network stack with the host network stack. This is often the fix for VM networking issues in other environments, too. Things like the host's VPN get reused directly instead of the VM needing to run its own VPN copy, for instance.

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#396
post #331

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I could but I do not need to, so i'd rather make better use of the time it would take me to move at this time. Biggest pain point actually are not programs, but the need to format all hard drives to some linux file system. I cannot just replace windows with linux and that is it. No, I have to migrate all my data somehow to reformat all my drives and then move the data back. That was always huge pain in the ass.

... there is always some excuse.

needs vs wants. it's as simple as that. i do not need to and i do not want to - at this time. when one or the other changes, then i'll make the switch. it's as simple as that. i know it is coming, it is not about avoiding it or being undecided. it's merely about the timing of the change, nothing more. i know for a fact W11 is not in my future.

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#397
post #264

I have been using windows since version 95. I even liked the Millennium version, that was most hated before Vista. I tried Linux several times, but Windows just always worked and Linux usually had always some issues(mostly drivers, lack of good programs and no gaming). But now, after more than two decades, I am certain Windows 10 is my last Windows. Nothing lasts for ever, not even Microsoft's domination on personal…

Just use Linux Mint

i'll be looking at fedora kde, cachy os, arch, maybe omarchy. either way i am definitely going for KDE. i always run ubuntu servers, but i tested few distros this year, i was mostly looking at fedora and suse, which are not rpm distros, but i was not happy, still, with some things. so i will have to do proper testing when time comes. i see fedora as "big" distro with good backing. arch as configurable distro. cachy supposedly has good performance tweaks in kernel and is good for gaming(whatever that means). and so on. each has its own ups and downs.

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#398

I've been living on an Unbuntu variant (Pop_OS) for over a year now and it's surprisingly good. Note that I had been a Mac-and-some-Windows user as far as desktops go for about 10 years prior to that, and had lots of Linux experience before that - so I'm experiencing a 10 year before-and-after. Things that intrigue me: - For photos, darktable is surprisingly good. I think this was my biggest single surprise, being a…

> GIMP was always great and now it's even better. For adding shapes/colours/annotations etc to photos, I found krita to be more accessible than gimp. E.g. I wanted to do changes to my contractor's realistic concept drawings and I could learn krita (guided by Claude Sonnet) and make the changes in a span of couple of hours.

Pinta is the best for editing screenshots, I’d say.

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#399
post #271
post #181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I largely agree with your points, but in this context - * A microsoft account is only needed for Windows 11 Home. A "semi-power user" is hopefully not using that edition of Windows... * I'm also greatly annoyed by the right click - but holding shift when right-clicking opens the expected menu, removing the extra click requirement. Some of my own annoyances though: * The taskbar/windows button seems to just...crash...…

> * A microsoft account is only needed for Windows 11 Home. A "semi-power user" is hopefully not using that edition of Windows... Both Home and Pro require Microsoft account to install and start using. Then you can create local only users in both editions and delete user joined to Microsoft account. This is standard operation even in OEM installs.

Neither Home nor Pro really require a MS account. You can skip that during setup (for example with "bypassNRO"). This might change in the future, but as of 25H2 the workarounds still work.

Re: Retiring Windows 10 and Microsoft's move towards a surveillance state

#400

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I would say that specifically with Secure Boot, Microsoft actually promoted user choice: A Windows Logo compliant PC needs to have Microsoft's root of trust installed by default. Microsoft could have stopped there, but they didn't. This was not the case with the initial rollout of Secure Boot, it was combined with locked BIOS to lock PCs so that they could only boot Windows 8 on some devices. This was the case on W…

> This was not the case with the initial rollout of Secure Boot, it was combined with locked BIOS to lock PCs so that they could only boot Windows 8 on some devices. This was the case on Windows RT ARM machines from that era. Okay, but, that was like 15 years ago, on some shitty first-run computers that no one bought. A failed first attempt. I've never met a single person that owned, or has ever used, a Windows RT de…

Normally I would agree that security measures are needed in many, but not all cases, but only if they are in complete control of the user and cannot by altered by any one organization. For-profit companies cannot be in control of these mechanisms. We have seen how they can be abused with the latest decision by Google to limit side-loading to people who identify themselves. So your take is really a misdirection from how these tools are being used against our property.
Post reply on HN