Live data from Hacker News

Gemini CLI

blog.google

391–400 of 820 posts

Re: Gemini CLI

#391
post #309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is useful, and directly contradicts the terms and conditions for Gemini CLI (edit: if you use the personal account, then its governed under the Code Assist T&C). I wonder which one is true?

Thanks for pointing that out, we're working on clarifying!

When should we expect to see an update? I assume there'll be meetings with lawyers for the clarification.

Re: Gemini CLI

#392
post #264
post #261

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is just Gemma model. Most people seek capabilities equivalent for Gemini 2.5 Pro if they want to do any kind of coding.

Gemma 27b can write working code in dozens of programming languages. It can even translate between languages. It's obviously not as good as Gemini, which is the best LLM in the world, but Gemma is built from the same technology that powers Gemini and Gemma is impressively good for something that's only running locally on your CPU or GPU. It's a great choice for airgapped environments. Especially if you use old OSes l…

I've spent a long time with models, gemma-3-27b feels distilled from Gemini 1.5. I think the useful coding abilities really started to emerge with 2.5.

Re: Gemini CLI

#393
post #243

If you use this, all of your code data will be sent to Google. From their terms: https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/resources/p... When you use Gemini Code Assist for individuals, Google collects your prompts, related code, generated output, code edits, related feature usage information, and your feedback to provide, improve, and develop Google products and services and machine learning technologies. To…

It's a lot more nuanced than that. If you use the free edition of Code Assist, your data can be used UNLESS you opt out, which is at the bottom of the support article you link to: "If you don't want this data used to improve Google's machine learning models, you can opt out by following the steps in Set up Gemini Code Assist for individuals." and then the link: https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/se…

> It's a lot more nuanced than that. If you use the free edition of Code Assist, your data can be used UNLESS you opt out,

Well... you are sending your data to a remote location that is not yours.

Re: Gemini CLI

#394
post #277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry, that's not correct. Did you check out the link? It doesn't describe the CLI, only the IDE. "You can find the Gemini Code Assist for individuals privacy notice and settings in two ways: - VS Code - IntelliJ "

That's because it's a bit of a nesting doll situation. As you can see here: https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli/tree/main If you scroll to the bottom, it says that the terms of service are governed based on the mechanism by which you access Gemini. If you access via code assist (which the OP posted), you abide by those privacy terms of code assist, one of the ways of which you access is VScode. If you access…

My understanding is that they have not implemented an opt-out feature for Gemini CLI, like they've done for VSCode and Jetbrains.

Re: Gemini CLI

#395
post #328

Here's the system prompt, rendered as a Gist: https://gist.github.com/simonw/9e5f13665b3112cea00035df7da69... More of my notes here: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Jun/25/gemini-cli/

Because Gemini CLI is OSS, you can also find the system prompt at: https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli/blob/4b5ca6bc777...

Re: Gemini CLI

#396
post #381

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That bears no relation to OpenAI using data for training purposes. Although the court’s decision is problematic, user data is being kept for legal purposes only, and OpenAI is not authorized to use it to train its models.

you must be naive to think OpenAI does not train on your data, Altman is infamous for deceiving claims.

I mean, using data that has been explicitly opted out of training paves the way for lawsuits and huge administrative fines in various jurisdictions. I might be naive, but I don’t think that’s something OpenAI would deliberately do.

Re: Gemini CLI

#398
post #311

This is all very cool, but I hate to be the "look at the shiny lights" guy... How did they do that pretty "GEMINI" gradient in the terminal? is that a thing we can do nowadays? It doesn't seem to be some blocky gradient where each character is a different color. It's a true gradient. (yes I'm aware this is likely a total clone of claude code, but still am curious about the gradient)

Maybe this will help: https://github.com/armanirodriguez/ansifade-py

And it is a blocky gradient, each character is a color. It's just the gradient they chose is slow enough that you don't notice.

Re: Gemini CLI

#399
post #274

Been using Claude Code (4 Opus) fairly successfully in a large Rust codebase, but sometimes frustrated by it with complex tasks. Tried Gemini CLI today (easy to get working, which was nice) and it was pretty much a failure. It did a notably worse job than Claude at having the Rust code modifications compile successfully. However, Gemini at one point output what will probably be the highlight of my day: "I have made a…

Same here. Tried to implement a new feature on one of our apps to test it. It completely screwed things up. Used undefined functions and stuff. After a couple of iterations of error reporting and fixing I gave up.

Claude did it fine but I was not happy with the code. What Gemini came up with was much better but it could not tie things together at the end.

Re: Gemini CLI

#400
Can't we standardize on AGENTS.md instead of all these specific CLAUDE.md and now GEMINI.md.

I just symlink now to AGENTS.md

Post reply on HN