Earlier quoted context omitted.
One of the reasons OrbStack is so great is because they implement their own hypervisor: https://orbstack.dev/ Apple’s stack gives you low-level access to ARM virtualization, and from there Apple has high-level convenience frameworks on top. OrbStack implements all of the high-level code themselves.
How does it compare to apple’s hv?
Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc
391–400 of 514 posts
Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc
#392looks like there isn't much to take away from this, here's a few bullet points: Apple Intelligence models primarily run on-device, potentially reducing app bundle sizes and the need for trivial API calls. Apple's new containerization framework is based on virtual machines (VMs) and not a true 'native' kernel-level integration like WSL1. Spotlight on macOS is widely perceived as slow, unreliable, and in significant ne…
Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc
#393Excited to try these out and see benchmarks. Expectations for on device small local model should be pretty low but let’s see if Apple cooked up any magic here.
Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc
#394There's a different thread if you want to wax about Fluid Glass etc [1], but there's some really interesting new improvements here for Apple Developers in Xcode 26. The new foundation frameworks around generative language model stuff looks very swift-y and nice for Apple developers. And it's local and on device. In the Platforms State of the Union they showed some really interesting sample apps using it to generate d…
Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc
#395Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does it really matter, tho?
Some people think it matters to properly learn history, instead of urban myths.
Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc
#396Okay, the AI stuff is cool, but that "Containerization framework" mention is kinda huge, right? I mean, native Linux container support on Mac could be a game-changer for my whole workflow, maybe even making Docker less of a headache.
FWIW, here are the repos for the CLI tool [1] and backend [2]. Looks like it is indeed VM-based container support (as opposed to WSLv1-style syscall translation or whatever): Containerization provides APIs to: [...] - Create an optimized Linux kernel for fast boot times. - Spawn lightweight virtual machines. - Manage the runtime environment of virtual machines. [1] https://github.com/apple/container [2] https://githu…
Is there a VM technology that can make Linux aware that it's running in a VM, and be able to hand back the memory it uses to the host OS?
Or maybe could Apple patch the kernel to do exactly this?
Running Docker in a VM always has been quite painful on Mac due to the excess amount of memory it uses, and Macs not really having a lot of RAM.
Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc
#397Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc
#398Some 15 years ago, A friend of mine said to me "mark my words, Apple will eventually merge OSX with iOS on the iPad". And with every passing keynote since then, it seemed Apple's been inching towards that prophecy, and today, the iPad has become practically a MacBook Air with a touch screen. Unless you were a video editor, programmer who needs resources to compile or a 3D artist, I don't see how you'd need anything o…
Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc
#399Some 15 years ago, A friend of mine said to me "mark my words, Apple will eventually merge OSX with iOS on the iPad". And with every passing keynote since then, it seemed Apple's been inching towards that prophecy, and today, the iPad has become practically a MacBook Air with a touch screen. Unless you were a video editor, programmer who needs resources to compile or a 3D artist, I don't see how you'd need anything o…
I don't use an iPad much, but it's been interesting to watch from afar how it's been changing over these years. They could have gone the direction of just running MacOS on it, but clearly they don't want to. I have a feeling that the only reason MacOS is the way it is, is because of history. If they were building a laptop from scratch, they would want it more in their walled garden. I'm curious to see what a "power u…
Re: Apple announces Foundation Models and Containerization frameworks, etc
#400iPad update is going to encourage a new series of folks trying to use iPads for general programming. I'm curious how it goes this time around. I'm cautiously optimistic