391–400 of 426 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
"It's usually just some hallucinated garbage. All of these LLM's don't have the full picture of my project." Cursor can have whole project in the context, or you can specify specific files that you want.
I’m looking at 150000 lines of Swift divided over some local packages and the main app, excluding external dependencies
It's amazing how little of my colleagues don't use Cursor simply because they haven't taken the 10 minutes to set it up. It's amazing how many naysayers there are about Cursor. There are many here and they obviously don't use Cursor. I know this because they point out pitfalls that Cursor barely runs into, and their criticism is not about Cursor, but about AI code in general. Some examples: "I tried to create a TODO…
Is it allowed to use cursor in work places? does cursor uploads company code or leak any information?
On the other hand, at another company, where the NDAs are stronger and more one-sided, and there's a stronger culture of code silos, "who needs to know" governing read access to individual code repos, even for mundane things like web dashboards, and higher security in general, I expected nobody would be allowed to use these tools, yet I saw people talking about their Copilot and Cursor use openly on the company Slack.
There was someone sitting next to me using Cursor yesterday. I'd consider hiring them, if they're interested, but there's no way they're going to want to join a company that forbids using AI tools that upload code being worked on.
So I don't think companies are particularly consistent about this at the moment.
(Perhaps Apple's Private Cloud Compute service, and whatever equivalents we get from other cloud vendors, will eventuall make a difference to how companies see this stuff. We might also see some interesting developments with fully homomorphic encryption (FHE). That's very slow, but the highly symmetric tensor arithmetic used in ML has potential to work better with FHE than general purpose compute.)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it allowed to use cursor in work places? does cursor uploads company code or leak any information?
At one company, the CEO said AI tools in general should not be used, due to fear of invalidating a patent application in progress after the lawyer said it must be kept secret except with NDA partners. I explained that locally run LLMs don't upload anything, so those are ok. This is a company that really needs better development velocity, and is buried alive in reports that need writing, On the other hand, at another…
What are the closest Emacs packages and flows for something similar to Cursor? Is the ability to use a tab in this way something that can be simply instructed or finetuned?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I started like this. Then I came around and can’t imagine going back. It’s kinda like having a really smart new grad, who works instantly, and has memorized all the docs. Yes I have to code review and guide it. That’s an easy trade off to make for typing 1000 tokens/s, never losing focus, and double checking every detail in realtime. First: it really does save a ton of time for tedious tasks. My best example is test…
> it can understand It can't understand. That's not what LLMs do.
It wrote the script, I ran it and it worked. I had it write another script which displays the found duplicate groups so I could see at a glance that the script had indeed worked. And for you this does not constitute any understanding? Yes it is assembling pieces of code or algorithmic procedures which it has memorized. But in this way it creates a script tailored to my wishes. The key is that it has to understand my intent.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> it can understand It can't understand. That's not what LLMs do.
This is a prompt I gave to o1-mini a while ago: My instructions follow now. The scripts which I provided you work perfectly fine. I want you to perform a change though. The image_data.pkl and faiss_index.bin are two databases consisting of rows, one for each image, in the end, right? My problem is that there are many duplicates: images with different names but the same content. I want you to write a script which for…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a prompt I gave to o1-mini a while ago: My instructions follow now. The scripts which I provided you work perfectly fine. I want you to perform a change though. The image_data.pkl and faiss_index.bin are two databases consisting of rows, one for each image, in the end, right? My problem is that there are many duplicates: images with different names but the same content. I want you to write a script which for…
I think the problem is our traditional notions of "understanding" and "intelligence" fail us. I don't think we understand what we mean by "understanding". Whatever the LLM is doing inside, it's far removed from what a human would do. But on the face of it, from an external perspective, it has many of the same useful properties as if done by a human. And the LLM's outputs seem to be converging closer and closer to wha…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But does great at generic stuff, which is already trivial to find on stack overflow. The major difference is that with Cursor you just hit "tab", and that thing is done. Vs breaking focus to open up a browser, searching SO, finding an applicable answer (hopefully), translating it into your editor, then reloading context in your head to keep moving.
The benefits of exploring is finding alternatives and knowing about gotchas. And knowing more about both the problem spaces and how the language/library/framework solves it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Installing pandoc is basically a one-time cost that is amortized over its uses, so... why worry about it? Relying on the compiler to catch every mistake is a pretty limited strategy.
> Installing pandoc is basically a one-time cost that is amortized over its uses, so... why worry about it? Because space of problems LLMs of today solve well with trivial prompts is vast, far greater than any single classical tool covers. If you're comparing solutions to 100 random problems, you have to count in those one-time costs, because you'll need to use some 50-100 different tools to get through them all. > R…