I am glad to see focus on user interface and interaction improvements. Even if I am not a huge fan of voice interfaces, I think that being able to interact in real-time will make working together with an AI be much more interesting and efficient. I actually hope they will take this back into the text based models. Current ChatGPT is sooo slow - both in starting to respond, typing things out, and also being overly verbose. I want to collaborate at the speed of thought.
GPT-4o
391–400 of 1001 posts
Re: GPT-4o
#392Damm, that was a big leap.
Re: GPT-4o
#393The usual critics will quickly point out that LLMs like GPT-4o still have a lot of failure modes and suffer from issues that remain unresolved. They will point out that we're reaping diminishing returns from Transformers. They will question the absence of a "GPT-5" model. And so on -- blah, blah, blah, stochastic parrots, blah, blah, blah. Ignore the critics. Watch the demos. Play with it. This stuff feels magical .…
Watching HAL happening in real life comes across as creepy, not magical. Double creepy with all the people praising this ‘magicality’.
I’m not a sceptic and apply AI on a daily basis, but whole “we can finally replace people” vibe is extremely off-putting. I had very similar feelings during pandemic, when majority of people was so seemingly happy to drop any real human interaction in favor of remote comms via chats/audio calls, it still creeps me out how ready we are as a society to drop anything remotely human in favor of technocratic advancement and “productivity”.
Re: GPT-4o
#394Impressed by the model so far. As far as independent testing goes, it is topping our leaderboard for chess puzzle solving by a wide margin now:
https://github.com/kagisearch/llm-chess-puzzles?tab=readme-o...
Re: GPT-4o
#395oh man, listening to the demos and the way the female AI voice laughed and giggled...there is going to be millions of lonely men who will fall in love with these.
Can't say whether that's good or bad.
Re: GPT-4o
#396The most impressive part is that the voice uses the right feelings and tonal language during the presentation. I'm not sure how much of that was that they had tested this over and over, but it is really hard to get that right so if they didn't fake it in some way I'd say that is revolutionary.
Right to who? To me, the voice sounds like an over enthusiastic podcast interviewer. Whats wrong with wanting computers to sound like what people think computers should sound like?
agree I don't get it. I just want the right information and explained well. I don't want to be social with a robot.
Re: GPT-4o
#397They are admitting[1] that the new model is the gpt2-chatbot that we have seen before[2]. As many highlighted there, the model is not an improvement like GPT3->GPT4. I tested a bunch of programming stuff and it was not that much better. It's interesting that OpenAI is highlighting the Elo score instead of showing results for many many benchmarks that all models are stuck at 50-70% success. [1] https://twitter.com/Lia…
I think the live demo that happened on the livestream is best to get a feel for this model[0]. I don't really care whether it's stronger than gpt-4-turbo or not. The direct real-time video and audio capabilities are absolutely magical and stunning . The responses in voice mode are now instantaneous, you can interrupt the model, you can talk to it while showing it a video, and it understands (and uses) intonation and…
This is going straight into 'Her' territory
Re: GPT-4o
#398The usual critics will quickly point out that LLMs like GPT-4o still have a lot of failure modes and suffer from issues that remain unresolved. They will point out that we're reaping diminishing returns from Transformers. They will question the absence of a "GPT-5" model. And so on -- blah, blah, blah, stochastic parrots, blah, blah, blah. Ignore the critics. Watch the demos. Play with it. This stuff feels magical .…
1. Demos are meant for feel magical and except in Apple's case they are often exaggerated versions of their real product.
2. Even then this is a wonderful step for tech in general and not just OpenAI. Makes me very excited.
3. Most economic value and growth driven by AI will not come from consumer apps but rather the enterprise use. I am interested in seeing how AI can automatically buy stuff for me, automate my home, reduce my energy used, automatically apply and get credit cards based on my purchases, find new jobs for me, negotiate with a car dealer on my behalf, detect when I am going to fall sick, better diabetes case and eventual cure etc. etc.
Re: GPT-4o
#399The usual critics will quickly point out that LLMs like GPT-4o still have a lot of failure modes and suffer from issues that remain unresolved. They will point out that we're reaping diminishing returns from Transformers. They will question the absence of a "GPT-5" model. And so on -- blah, blah, blah, stochastic parrots, blah, blah, blah. Ignore the critics. Watch the demos. Play with it. This stuff feels magical .…
> It makes the movie "Her" look like it's no longer in the realm of science fiction but in the realm of incremental product development
Are we supposed to cheer to that?
We're already mid way to the full implementation of 1984, do we need Her before we get to Matrix ?
Re: GPT-4o
#400Impressed by the model so far. As far as independent testing goes, it is topping our leaderboard for chess puzzle solving by a wide margin now: https://github.com/kagisearch/llm-chess-puzzles?tab=readme-o...
Is the test set public?