Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the only content you find on YouTube is trash that sounds like a you problem. My feed is filled with high effort content.
I have found quality content. Notice how the people who work hard to make content outside YouTube's incentives need an external Patreon to fund their work? Why should I pay to fund the Mr. Beasts while the quality creators have to find funding outside the system? Also: I am sure you've seen it -- a creator you like or admire starts succumbing to the incentives, making sillier and sillier thumbnails or "experimenting"…
Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message
391–400 of 433 posts
Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message
#392Earlier quoted context omitted.
The only happy ending for everyone is zero ads.
Then subscribe and pay for the service. One way or another someone has to pay for the content.
Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message
#393Earlier quoted context omitted.
The data of rich profiles is enormously valuable to Google. They allow Google unparalleled ability to target ads elsewhere, too. That's the game.
OK, but they make YouTube. They make the rules of the game. Pay for it with $$$ or by watching Ads, don’t watch YouTube, or pretend there’s some kind of morality in stealing it.
Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message
#394Earlier quoted context omitted.
Youtube-dl (well, yt-dlp, the non-dead version) will ignore the ads.
yeah but how do you setup a one-stop-shop solution to download the new videos from channels you follow?
Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message
#395Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message
#396Earlier quoted context omitted.
So why do you still use their service if you don’t like them so much? Whether or not you approve of the rules someone sets for use of their private property doesn’t affect their legal rights, so it seems you shouldn’t be helping them.
I use many things that aren't perfect, lacking any better option. I didn't have time this week to become Jeff Bezos and buy Google and fix Youtube.
Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message
#397Earlier quoted context omitted.
YouTube offers their service under specific terms: watch ads or pay directly. If you don’t like it, your only ethical option is not using it. It’s not a basic need and anyone can live a happy and full life without it, there’s no need to pretend that not keeping your side of the agreement is somehow just if you squint hard enough.
I will write down my ethical obligation to Google on a piece of paper and wipe my arse with it. The only ethical obligation that exists is on American legislators and regulators to bring down the hammer of justice, smashing Alphabet and co-conspirators into one hundred thousand grains of sand and blow them into the wind. And thanks for the life advice acdha, but I'm quite happy to continue 'stealing' every single sec…
Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message
#398Maybe it's just A/B testing, but I got the "3 strikes and no more video playback" thing, which this DOM element blocking doesn't work around it seems :( After years of procrastinating, I'm finally gonna get around to setting up a basic homelab to run pihole. Thanks, youtube execs and bean counters, for kicking my lazy ass into gear on this! In a way, I kinda wish that ads worked as well as youtube suggestions. If one…
Mate if you get so much value from YouTube that you'll jump through these hoops just to use it without ads, why not just subscribe to premium? Personally it's by far my most bang-for-buck service.
Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message
#399Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use many things that aren't perfect, lacking any better option. I didn't have time this week to become Jeff Bezos and buy Google and fix Youtube.
That begs the question of why it’s so critical to have an unlimited supply of mediocre video – you don’t need to build a competitor, just find another outlet for your spare time which is hardly a challenge.
Re: Anti-Anti-Adblocker uBlock filter to get rid of the annoying YouTube message
#400Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here’s a crazy idea… I don’t want to give any money to Google, but I would happily pay double the amount in taxes to get public infrastructure of comparable quality.
You want a government-run YouTube?
(I mean, that’s the hard variation of what I said… A softer variation would allow for public-corporate partnerships, or would merely regulate corporate activity much more.)