Earlier quoted context omitted.
> is censorship resistance through genuine self-custody. https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2018/04/05/debunking-bu... > Ordinary person: “Your weird Internet money sucks to use. It’s slow and expensive. I lost my coins by mistake and it can’t be fixed. If I get hacked it can’t be fixed either.” > Bitcoin advocate: “But everyone wants [list of ideological aims held only by weird people]! Everyone I know, anyway.” B…
Being slow and expensive doesn't make something a scam. If you falsely label the blockchain as a scam, and want people to not have even the option of using, I contend that your real issue is with people having self-custody over their money, and thus you believe in a modern form of serfdom. All your sophistry aside that is.
UPI Payments: 10B transactions a month done, next stop 100B
391–399 of 399 posts
Re: UPI Payments: 10B transactions a month done, next stop 100B
#392Earlier quoted context omitted.
Being slow and expensive doesn't make something a scam. If you falsely label the blockchain as a scam, and want people to not have even the option of using, I contend that your real issue is with people having self-custody over their money, and thus you believe in a modern form of serfdom. All your sophistry aside that is.
The scam nature is explained in the links in my thread opener: https://news.ycombinator.com/context?id=37368544
Please read the responses and don't encourage flame wars.
Re: UPI Payments: 10B transactions a month done, next stop 100B
#393Many countries have a single dominant privately owned e-cash system. The only alternative to a future with centralized financial systems, where the individual's right to transact won't be at the total mercy of the whims of forces they don't control (e.g. a corporation which deems their credit risk as unacceptably high, a political zeitgeist that deems their unwillingness to get vaccinated as making them deserving fin…
While I agree with many of your points, in this context, UPI is just a money transfer platform. It’s not currency or a currency equivalent of any sort. There is a CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency) in a pilot phase in India since last year.
I personally think a centrally owned service like the IPS is very useful. I just think we would be better off having a permissionless and decentralized alternative that has wide enough adoption to make useful and hard to prohibit, to both provide competition to the centrally controlled network, and to act as a failsafe in case that network is mismanaged and run in an abusive fashion, e.g. locking out those who refused to get a COVID vaccine.
Re: UPI Payments: 10B transactions a month done, next stop 100B
#394I was in India earlier this year, and found there was no way (and I spent hours trying) for a foreigner to get access to the UPI system. This meant: 1) There were some cashless fast food outlets that I couldn't eat at 2) There was no way for me to book an intercity bus ticket I eventually managed to get a bus ticket by sweet-talking someone in a shop to use their personal UPI account in exchange for cash. I fear ther…
In contrast, in Japan, they may have NFC payments by card/phone, online payments, but every single bus/train/cab/boat accepts cash as the lowest common denominator. Forget payments, all public offices still support paper + post for all procedures I've had to do, with the option of doing things with a phone or a PC. In India, however, for several things I've had to do, they would rip out the old system and replace it with a online portal with dubious implementation, and often disregarding laws (for example using UID number as legal identity proof, while it shouldn't have been, by law).
Re: UPI Payments: 10B transactions a month done, next stop 100B
#395Earlier quoted context omitted.
The scam nature is explained in the links in my thread opener: https://news.ycombinator.com/context?id=37368544
That has already been refuted: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37368625 Please read the responses and don't encourage flame wars.
> The only fundamental difference inherent to the respective designs of blockchains and traditional banking, is censorship resistance through genuine self-custody.
Then this is nonsense. The fundamental difference between the two is that one deals with real money while the other does not.
Re: UPI Payments: 10B transactions a month done, next stop 100B
#396That's >50% of monthly global Visa transactions [1]. Monthly volume at ~$190 billion [2], as compared to ~$1 trillion monthly volume for Visa globally [3]. Pretty good, given that most banks have daily UPI limits of $1200, and much lower individual transaction limits. [1] https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/technology/2023/07/... [2] https://www.cnbctv18.com/technology/upi-monthly-transaction-... [3] https://ann…
It's 1200 USD per day.
Re: UPI Payments: 10B transactions a month done, next stop 100B
#397Earlier quoted context omitted.
Super affordable smartphones and cheap and fast 4G data, great apps like GPay and PhonePe with lots of gamification and cashbacks and ubiquitous merchant acceptance through apps like PayTM, PhonePe and GPay were key drivers for this. Then, demonetization and covid were accelerants to achieve critical mass. Post 2022, its been unstoppable.
one conspiratorily wonders if its a government ploy to turn everyone cashless so that they can be debanked at will.
Re: UPI Payments: 10B transactions a month done, next stop 100B
#398Earlier quoted context omitted.
That has already been refuted: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37368625 Please read the responses and don't encourage flame wars.
There is not a word that would contend any of the arguments made. If you meant: > The only fundamental difference inherent to the respective designs of blockchains and traditional banking, is censorship resistance through genuine self-custody. Then this is nonsense. The fundamental difference between the two is that one deals with real money while the other does not.
Re: UPI Payments: 10B transactions a month done, next stop 100B
#399Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree than tracking detailed purchase data can lead to serious discrimination and inequity especially in a dictatorship. The use case in your example, however, seems fair: * The person has a choice whether to consume fast food regularly. It’s their freedom, yes, but they should also accept the costs that come with their lifestyle choices. Similarly, if someone chooses to regularly drive at a daredevil speed, they s…
Why should I subsidize parents who choose to raise kids in carcinogenic cities?
The amount of privilege in asking this question is just shocking. As if people can so easily choose where they live. Try telling miners and nomadic construction workers that.