Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, what you are entitled in the EU is to have the decision reviewed by a human, I fail to see how an AI changes that.
No what? Let's imagine my bank is sexist, the code literally says "if WOMAN, Reject' You can sue my bank for discrimination, and in process of discovery you can request information and documents from the bank, including the code / formulas. If you have a solid argument, let's say my bank never approved a mortgage for a woman, the judge will grant your request. You, or someone appointed on your behalf, will look at th…
That isn’t how it would work in reality.
It would be up to the bank to prove that their practices are non discriminatory if there will be a discrepancy between the number of applications issued.
The plaintiffs will be able to sue and win based on the outcome alone.
As far as actual rights go then you have the right to appeal any automated decision and have a human review it without any bias. Which again it doesn’t matter if it’s AI or a an algorithm based on flipping a coin.