Overly analytical guide to escorting

Also mean income (as measured by her study of other workers) is $100,000 with her average rates of her sample around 500-600.

Effectively

    = F(x)(y)(z)

   X - number of people earning 200x the hourly rate

   Y -  % of that interested in paying for sex[1]

   Z - relative beauty rank among service providers[2] in that area

[1] age is strong factor so demographics is a good proxy metric.

Also perhaps friction with law is proxy for cultural acceptance and can be numerically scaled : fully legal, decriminalized, or criminal with quantum of punishment for scaling. And degree of enforcement measured by number of arrests / convictions etc.

[2] probably being 9 in LA wouldnt be the same as say Wyoming( demand would be lesser as a counter pressure)

[3] touring is a thing perhaps because of this.

I'm not a libertarian, but libertarians -- unless they're of the high school variety -- are not carte blanche small government. They are certainly limited government. Perhaps you should begin by not arguing against high-school-level strawmen.

> The drug war is indirectly causing more illegal immigration into the US because it's destabilizing South America.

Almost certainly, but what happens in South America is not america's problem. America can build a wall and deport the illegal aliens back, as any sovereign country would.

> The drug war is shifting large profits away from US pharma and into foreign narco gangs, which is bad for GDP growth and therefore the strength of the nation.

Yes, unfortunately, we do not imprison enough whites for their drug habits, and instead jail mostly non-whites. The solution is to put more white drug users in jail for a very long time or institute pretty harsh rehabilitation programs (i.e., not released until you're sober for X amount of time, and then close follow-up monitoring).

> The drug war means taxation needs to be higher because it's expensive.

That's fine. I'm not against taxation, as long as the taxes are being spent on worthwhile things that are the purview of government. For example, if you told me taxes had to be raised 1% for 'diversity training' I'd say no, because diversity training is not the purview of government. If you told me taxes had to be raised 20% due to an increase in crime and the need to imprison and incarcerate more criminals, that would be okay. WE all have to share society's burdens, I just don't want to share the burden of things I don't want.

> The drug war creates more street crime, which ranks highly in what right-leaning people care about.

Indeed. So we should institute harsher criminal sentencing.

> So I just don't understand why right-leaning people (not just libertarians) are so actively voting against almost all of their stated interests.

Dude... you live in a bubble. There is no group of 'right-leaning' people who 'state' their interests in some centralized publication.

The only people who 'state' right-leaning people's interests are left-wing publications trying to create strawmen. Perhaps listen to others instead of imagining their interests?

> how bad it is for the black community,

The black community was the initial force behind the drug war

> how poor whites are being literally killed by fentanyl

More doctors and pharmacists should frankly be in jail.

> how it pushes people into more dangerous and cheaper drugs such as ice and crack

Great, those dealers should be imprisoned too. We have too few prisons in this country, given the level of crime and drugs.

> how hypocritical it is for alcohol and cigarettes to be legal

Alcohol and cigarettes have a long cultural history. They are luxuries tolerated for the culture. Not something innate.

> how morally questionable it is to punish a victimless crime

The victim is the person doing the drugs. It is well within the purview of government to punish people for victimizing themselves, to discourage the behavior. For example, many countries used to criminalize attempted suicide. I'm not going to turn this into an argument on that... but that is well within the government's purview.

Is the irony not lost on you making such a statement on post about prostitution?

A "sex worker" is just a euphemism for a whore. You know what they say about lipsticks and pigs.

> that most sex work is done in desperation, that our society doesn't give everyone even close to a level playing field.

Cry me a river. That is such a lame copout. Not all of these prostitutes are desperate, and even the ones that are make a better living than some software engineers. You are telling me that a person can't find any job other than selling their own body??? What would you tell all the other women making minimum wage? Should they all become whores too?

My whole point was that desperate men don't even have the same luxury of such a fallback "job", so your statement is rather ironic.

> - Some comments showing veiled resentment that they have to pay a woman for sex, that women have it easier, that men are the unlucky ones, the oppressed ones.

Well, is it not true? In the sexual marketplace getting sex for women is effortless, and for men it takes all the effort in the world.

That's a good argument against wage labor in capitalism, but not a specific argument against prostitution as opposed to other, particularly physical, wage labor.