Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Racist violence is political violence. It is agents of the state enforcing a racial order which is inextricable from (and perpetuated by) the politics of the state. Boloney. It is individuals, even if in positions of authority (and even if far too many of them), carrying out their own warped agenda, not that of the state. > Okay, but then people are more likely to be killed by a police officer than by arson. So why…
Even if you oppose both for the same reason, you should be able to recognize that they are not, in fact, the same. You're ignoring the power dynamics at play here which makes violence and excessive force by police officers far worse than arson by the rioters. If you equate all violence as being the same, then you're saying that the violence committed by the oppressed is the same as the violence committed by the oppre…
How to Make this Moment the Turning Point for Real Change
391–400 of 430 posts
Re: How to Make this Moment the Turning Point for Real Change
#392Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's lots of precedent of officers being charged and arrested. Not often enough, and they are especially acquitted too often, but the public perception that they aren't charged is a function of media narrative, not fact.
The cop in question had 18 prior complaints against him. I don't know about you, but if I had 18 complaints against me at work, I would probably have got in trouble by now, and I'm not talking about two "letters of reprimand". https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/01/us/derek-chauvin-what-we-...
Re: How to Make this Moment the Turning Point for Real Change
#393Earlier quoted context omitted.
I cannot condone violence nor encourage it, but you have to admit that the first few protests and property damage drastically influenced the quick arrest of an officer that may not have been arrested or even fired if it didn't happen. The non-violent protests of Colin Kaepernick were mocked and used to rally the other side and just weren't effective. The problem here is not the violence, but a policing system that is…
"See, people with power understand exactly one thing: violence." - Noam Chomsky.
"See, people with power understand exactly one thing: violence. If violence is effective, it's okay. But if violence loses it's efectiveness, then they start worrying and have to try somethong else." - Noam Chomsky.
Re: How to Make this Moment the Turning Point for Real Change
#394Earlier quoted context omitted.
My crazy ideas to stop this and violence/law-breaking in general. This should cause a huge reduction in these issues we claim we're having. 1. Body cams mandatory for all police inside & outside of the station, and they stay on 100% of the time and batteries should last the whole shift. No ifs/buts/maybes. If the need arises, bathroom breaks can be edited out after the fact. 2. National ID card, in all states and man…
So the police never arrest someone for non-violent crimes, and the only disincentive is to get fined. This basically just gives people a license to steal whatever they want and stalk and harass anyone they want, so long as they don't lay a finger on a person. The only consequences are fines, and non-payment of a fine is not a violent crime and thus not cause for arrest.
Re: How to Make this Moment the Turning Point for Real Change
#395Earlier quoted context omitted.
> police kill members of their community at random. I understand your emotion, but saying that the police walks in the street killing random black people is also unproductive. You can imagine folks on the right showcasing your post as an example of the "loony left", then starting a discussion about the fact that more whites are killed by police, and so on. Each time that happens, you lose a tiny bit of support, and t…
> saying that the police walks in the street killing random black people is also unproductive It's unfortunately true though. We have seen countless examples in the last few years alone where the victim was murdered by a cop. And those are only the ones that were recorded and managed to go viral.
Re: How to Make this Moment the Turning Point for Real Change
#396Earlier quoted context omitted.
> One big problem is that the elected after being elected, choose to not follow or dilute those promises. There is no accountability. So time and again, democracy fails as they just change their minds after being elected. One solution to this is more direct democracy. When people can propose initiatives and vote on them in referendums, it is harder for politicians to ignore that agenda. This works pretty well in Swit…
> This works pretty well in Switzerland. Democracy that works in a country of 8.6 million does not scale up to work for a country of 330 million.
Re: How to Make this Moment the Turning Point for Real Change
#397"I’ve heard some suggest that the recurrent problem of racial bias in our criminal justice system proves that only protests and direct action can bring about change, and that voting and participation in electoral politics is a waste of time. I couldn’t disagree more. The point of protest is to raise public awareness... But eventually, aspirations have to be translated into specific laws and institutional practices —…
did you just "actually" Barack Obama on how change happens in a democracy?
Do you agree with Barack Obama on everything?
Re: How to Make this Moment the Turning Point for Real Change
#398Earlier quoted context omitted.
> One big problem is that the elected after being elected, choose to not follow or dilute those promises. There is no accountability. So time and again, democracy fails as they just change their minds after being elected. One solution to this is more direct democracy. When people can propose initiatives and vote on them in referendums, it is harder for politicians to ignore that agenda. This works pretty well in Swit…
>This works pretty well in Switzerland. The place where women couldn't vote in federal elections until 1971, and in local elections as late as 1990?
(It's a known fact, yes, in general, people do vote more socially conservatively in referendums, often backing up status quo. But that doesn't prevent progressive politicians to come up with better proposals.)
In any case, if we use your logic, US would be perfect country for this, being one of the last countries on Earth that doesn't have universal health care system.
Interestingly, many U.S. states do have some direct democracy provisions, courtesy of the progressive movement at the beginning of the 20th century. But what I heard it was sabotaged at federal level by the administration at the time, because U.S. wanted to get a bit involved in WW1 and it could potentially prevent that.
Re: How to Make this Moment the Turning Point for Real Change
#399Earlier quoted context omitted.
I personally think body camera footage should be public. I would even go as far to say security cameras owned by public institutions should also be public. I think the answer to “who watchers the watchers?” should be a group of trustworthy people beyond reproach, but the absence of such a group necessitates that this responsibility fall upon the public at large [0]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quis_custodiet_ip…
I don't know about you, but I don't really want my various encounters with the police to be broadcast to the public. They would need to algorithmically blur out all of our faces or something in order to make that palatable.
Re: How to Make this Moment the Turning Point for Real Change
#400Earlier quoted context omitted.
> One big problem is that the elected after being elected, choose to not follow or dilute those promises. There is no accountability. So time and again, democracy fails as they just change their minds after being elected. One solution to this is more direct democracy. When people can propose initiatives and vote on them in referendums, it is harder for politicians to ignore that agenda. This works pretty well in Swit…
>This works pretty well in Switzerland. The place where women couldn't vote in federal elections until 1971, and in local elections as late as 1990?