Live data from Hacker News

Westinghouse Files for Bankruptcy, in Blow to Nuclear Power

nytimes.com

391–398 of 398 posts

Re: Westinghouse Files for Bankruptcy, in Blow to Nuclear Power

#391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just don't think Japanese companies have a process on dealing with foreign M&As and fraud mitigation. When Hitachi acquired the spanish manufacturing company AnsaldoBreda, there were similar fraud accusations.

Sony's acquisition of Columbia/TriStar hasn't gone particularly well either...

I don't know if that's fraud as much as they just aren't using that business right. Sony is weird, having an entertainment division they keep writing off when their only profitable consumer products division is PlayStation.

Re: Westinghouse Files for Bankruptcy, in Blow to Nuclear Power

#392
post #181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right now waste can and should be recycled which would reduce the amount of waste. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_waste Soon it will be possible to use most of the waste as fuel: "...Fast reactors can "burn" long lasting nuclear transuranic waste (TRU) waste components (actinides: reactor-grade plutonium and minor actinides), turning liabilities into assets. Another major waste component, fission products…

The remnants of decommissioned reactors can't be recycled though. There will be literal mountains of moderately to highly dangerous rubble.

No, anything that has residual radiation will be entombed in clay/rock/etc. The total amount of material and radiation from this will be trivial compared to coal waste.

"...Nearly every major river in the Southeast has one or more unlined, leaking pits on its banks filled with water and holding coal ash from power plants. Containing millions of tons of toxin-laden waste, these pits are unlined and have leaked arsenic, mercury, thallium, selenium, and other contaminants into the rivers and the underlying groundwater for decades. "

https://www.southernenvironment.org/cases-and-projects/coal-...

Re: Westinghouse Files for Bankruptcy, in Blow to Nuclear Power

#393
post #165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You're not going to get kicked out of your home and neighborhood forever because of a malfunction at the coal plant. Until we get a couple more of degrees globally and we'll see floods in many coastal cities. Not to mention destroying the stability of weather we had for ~12,000 years and allowed farming to thrive.

That's not a malfunction at the coal plant, that's a failure by the government to regulate polluters and protect the commons.

"Coal plants are the nation’s top source of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, the primary cause of global warming. In 2011, utility coal plants in the United States emitted a total of 1.7 billion tons of CO21. A typical coal plant generates 3.5 million tons of CO2 per year2."

http://www.ucsusa.org/clean-energy/coal-and-other-fossil-fue...

Ever wonder why you read that you should avoid eating fish because of mercury?

"...Every state in America has issued health advisories warning people to limit or avoid eating certain species of fish due to toxic mercury contamination, many of which cover every waterbody in the state. ...Coal-fired power plants are the single largest source of mercury contamination in the U.S., responsible for approximately 50% of human-caused mercury emissions."

https://www.nwf.org/~/media/PDFs/Global-Warming/NWF-Mercury-...

These are long terms effects of burning coal - in the short term tens of thousands die each year from the air pollution from coal plants.

The failure of government is that we allow coal and natural gas to be burned when there are alternatives that are much better for the environment and much better for the general health.

Re: Westinghouse Files for Bankruptcy, in Blow to Nuclear Power

#394
post #381
post #380

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "Tesla set fire to a Powerpack to test its safety features – the results are impressive" This is cherrypicking to make a point. The batteries still contain chemicals which are toxic to life and environment. There will come a time when those batteries are "consumed" and the chemicals within them need to be dealt with in some safe manner. As far as I know, there's no battery technology with any side effects. Tesla's…

Isn't there large economic incentive to recycle large batteries? I agree many won't be recycled, but until we snag ourselves and asteroid, we have a finite supply of lithium. People will do their best to not lose something worth money.

To be economically viable battery recycling is done in developing countries that don't enforce environmental regulations. This is specifically talking about lead batteries, but Lithium-Ion is basically the same: http://www.okinternational.org/lead-batteries/Recycling

Re: Westinghouse Files for Bankruptcy, in Blow to Nuclear Power

#395

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure it has. Now it has a WiFi antenna and an embedded webserver so that you can see the temperature of the water on your smartphone(app installation required) The boiler will get software updates until the next 3-4 year cycle, then you will need to buy a new boiler to get the latest BoilerOS(tm) that adds the ability to remotely set the temperature. No need for that to be secure...What's the worst that could happen?…

You just added another line to my face. So thanks for that. Just don't leave out the small openboileros crew serving up lawsuit magnet heat due to insurance issues of modifying your water boiling code.

Only officially sanctioned iBoiler parts may be used. Use of an unauthorized part will cause the boiler to enter DRM guard mode and cease operation for violation of the OpenBoilerOS software license.

You can expect a nastygram from the BSA(Boiler Software Alliance) for your attempt to circumvent their DRM.

Re: Westinghouse Files for Bankruptcy, in Blow to Nuclear Power

#396

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sony's acquisition of Columbia/TriStar hasn't gone particularly well either...

I don't know if that's fraud as much as they just aren't using that business right. Sony is weird, having an entertainment division they keep writing off when their only profitable consumer products division is PlayStation.

It may not have been fraud fraud, but they paid $4.8B and wrote off $2.7B of that within five years. Somebody didn't know exactly what he was buying...

Re: Westinghouse Files for Bankruptcy, in Blow to Nuclear Power

#397
post #392

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The remnants of decommissioned reactors can't be recycled though. There will be literal mountains of moderately to highly dangerous rubble.

No, anything that has residual radiation will be entombed in clay/rock/etc. The total amount of material and radiation from this will be trivial compared to coal waste. "...Nearly every major river in the Southeast has one or more unlined, leaking pits on its banks filled with water and holding coal ash from power plants. Containing millions of tons of toxin-laden waste, these pits are unlined and have leaked arsenic…

> No, anything that has residual radiation will be entombed in clay/rock/etc

Fine, it'll be an underground mountain :-)

> [...]compared to coal waste[...]Containing millions of tons of toxin-laden waste[...]

Holy shit, I had never even considered ash. It just never crossed my mind somehow. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

It doesn't make me any less opposed to nuclear energy, but you've given me one more reason to be against coal plants (as if there weren't enough already).

Re: Westinghouse Files for Bankruptcy, in Blow to Nuclear Power

#398
post #283

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Studies show that efficiency initiatives can reduce emissions[1][2]. It's not going to solve everything, but as I said, it's going to be a major component, as will alternative energy sources like wind and solar (you won't be able to get 100% wind and solar, but you don't have to). Any serious analysis of ways to fight global warming looks at a variety of different actions. They don't pretend that there's a single com…

Global emissions are up, despite efficiency improvements. The proper level to look at the system is the whole earth. Those reports look at local instances. Don't get me wrong. I think efficiency is good. I'm just not sure it actually can reduce emissions globally.

Population and consumption probably outpace efficiency gains, right?
Post reply on HN