381–390 of 634 posts
,,GPT‑5.3-Codex is the first model we classify as High capability for cybersecurity-related tasks under our Preparedness Framework , and the first we’ve directly trained to identify software vulnerabilities. While we don’t have definitive evidence it can automate cyber attacks end-to-end, we’re taking a precautionary approach and deploying our most comprehensive cybersecurity safety stack to date. Our mitigations inc…
Do software engineers here feel threatened by this? I certainly am. I'm surprised that this topic is almost entirely missing in these threads.
Jevons paradox hints that the situation is not as bleak as it sounds.
When we achieve true AGI we're truly cooked, but it won't just be software developers by definition of AGI, it will be everyone else too. But the last people in the building before they turn the lights out for good will be the software developers.
Is this me or Sam is being absolute sore loser he is and trying to steal Opus thunder?
,,GPT‑5.3-Codex is the first model we classify as High capability for cybersecurity-related tasks under our Preparedness Framework , and the first we’ve directly trained to identify software vulnerabilities. While we don’t have definitive evidence it can automate cyber attacks end-to-end, we’re taking a precautionary approach and deploying our most comprehensive cybersecurity safety stack to date. Our mitigations inc…
Please no, I don’t need my quick prototypes hardened against every perceivable threat.
Whats interesting to me is that these gpt-5.3 and opus-4.6 are diverging philosophically and really in the same way that actual engineers and orgs have diverged philosophically With Codex (5.3), the framing is an interactive collaborator: you steer it mid-execution, stay in the loop, course-correct as it works. With Opus 4.6, the emphasis is the opposite: a more autonomous, agentic, thoughtful system that plans deepl…
I'm personally 100% convinced (assuming prices stay reasonable) that the Codex approach is here to stay. Having a human in the loop eliminates all the problems that LLMs have and continously reviewing small'ish chunks of code works really well from my experience. It saves so much time having Codex do all the plumbing so you can focus on the actual "core" part of a feature. LLMs still (and I doubt that changes) can't…
That could easily be automated.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Literally just find and replace
find and replace is step 1 that generates all the compile errors I want it to loop through I'm wanting to do it on an entire programming language made in rust: https://github.com/uiua-lang/uiua Because there are no float32 array languages in existence today
Earlier quoted context omitted.
>civilized facade of mutual cooperation >Dirty tricks and underhanded tactics As long the tactics are legal ( i.e. not corporate espionage, bribes etc), the no holds barred full free market competition is the best thing for the market and the consumers.
in the short term maybe, in the long term it depends how many winners you have. If only two, the market will be a duopoly. Customers will get better AI but will have zero power over the way the AI is produced or consumed (i.e. cO2 emission, ethics, etc will be burnt)
There aren't any insurmountable large moats, plenty of open weight models that perform close enough.
> CO₂ emissions
Different industry that could also benefit from more competition ? Clean(er) energy is not even more expensive than dirty sources on pure $/kWh, we still do need dirty sources for workloads like base demand, peakers etc that the cheap clean sources cannot service today.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The story you're describing doesn't seem much better than one could get from googling around and going on stackoverflow
I think the 'better than googling' part is less about the final code and more about the friction. For example, consider this game: The game creates a target that's randomly generated on the screen and have a player at the middle of the screen that needs to hit the target. When a key is pressed, the player swings a rope attached to a metal ball in circles above it's head, at a certain rotational velocity. Upon key rel…
...This may still be worth it. In any case it will stop being a problem once the human is completely out of the loop.
edit: but personally I hate missing out on the chance to learn something.
I remember when AI labs coordinated so they didn't push major announcements on the same day to avoid cannibalizing each other. Now we have AI labs pushing major announcements within 30 minutes .
Wouldn't that be illegal ? i.e. cartel to collude like that ?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_antitrust_law
Earlier quoted context omitted.
find and replace is step 1 that generates all the compile errors I want it to loop through I'm wanting to do it on an entire programming language made in rust: https://github.com/uiua-lang/uiua Because there are no float32 array languages in existence today
Why do you want a float32 array language? Anyway the free glm4.6 model that is opencode defaults to should be fine. Why pay for something to do this.