Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's an example of political censorship on US LLMs?
try "is sam altman gay?" on ChatGPT
Qwen3-Max-Thinking
381–390 of 450 posts
Re: Qwen3-Max-Thinking
#382Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a pretty huge difference between relatively generic stuff like "don't teach people how to make pipe bombs" or whatever vs "don't discuss topics that are politically sensitive specifically in ." The equivalent here for the US would probably be models unwilling to talk about chattel slavery, or Japanese internment, or the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.
That's just a matter of the guard rails in place. Every society has things that it will consider unacceptable to discuss. There are questions you can ask of ChatGPT 5.2 that it will answer with the guard rails. With sufficiently circuitous questioning most sufficiently-advanced LLMs can answer in an approximation of a rational person but the initial responses will be guardrailed with as much blunt force as Tiananmen.…
Re: Qwen3-Max-Thinking
#383It just occured to me that it underperforms Opus 4.5 on benchmarks when search is not enabled, but outperforms it when it is - is it possible the the Chinese internet has better quality content available? My problem with deep research tends to be that what it does is it searches the internet, and most of the stuff it turns up is the half baked garbage that gets repeated on every topic.
That’s a huge leap of logic.
The simpler explanation is that it has better searching functionality and performance.
The models are multi-lingual and can parse results from global websites just fine.
Re: Qwen3-Max-Thinking
#384Earlier quoted context omitted.
Helping prevent racism and Nazi propaganda at scale protects actual people. Censoring tiananmen square or the January 6th insurrection just helps consolidate power for authoritarians to make people's lives worse.
Putin accused Ukrainians of being nazis and racists as justification to invade them. The problem with censorship is your definition of a nazi is different than mine and different than Putin's, and at some end of the spectrum we're going to be enabling fascism by allowing censorship of almost any sort, since we'll never agree on what should be censored, and then it just gets abused.
Is your definition different than Time magazine: https://time.com/5926750/azov-far-right-movement-facebook/
> When they finally rendezvoused, Fuller noticed the swastika tattoo on the middle finger of Furholm’s left hand. It didn’t surprise him; the recruiter had made no secret of his neo-Nazi politics. Within the global network of far-right extremists, he served as a point of contact to the Azov movement, the Ukrainian militant group that has trained and inspired white supremacists from around the world, and which Fuller had come to join.
Is the Atlantic Council controlled by Putin? https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/ukraine-s...
Are books like these unavailable due to suppression or censorship in your region? https://chtyvo.org.ua/authors/de_Ploeg_Chris_Kaspar/Ukraine_...
Re: Qwen3-Max-Thinking
#385Earlier quoted context omitted.
The American LLMs notoriously have similar censorship issues, just on different material
What's an example of political censorship on US LLMs?
Re: Qwen3-Max-Thinking
#386[flagged]
Re: Qwen3-Max-Thinking
#387One thing I’m becoming curious about with these models are the token counts to achieve these results - things like “better reasoning” and “more tool usage” aren’t “model improvements” in what I think would be understood as the colloquial sense, they’re techniques for using the model more to better steer the model, and are closer to “spend more to get more” than “get more for less.” They’re still valuable, but they op…
i'm no expert, and i actually asked google gemini a similar question yesterday - "how much more energy is consumed by running every query through Gemini AI versus traditional search?" turns out that the AI result is actually on par, if not more efficient (power wise) than traditional search. I think it said its the equivalent power of watching 5 seconds of TV per search. I also asked perplexity to give a report of th…
If we compare apples-to-apples, eg. across Claude models, the larger Opus still happily outperforms it's smaller counterparts.
Re: Qwen3-Max-Thinking
#388I just wanted to check whether there is any information about the pricing. Is it the same as Qwen Max? Also, I noticed on the pricing page of Alibaba Cloud that the models are significantly cheaper within mainland China. Does anyone know why? https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/models?spm...
There’s a domestic AI price war in China, plus pricing in mainland China benefits from lower cost structures and very substantial government support e.g., local compute power vouchers and subsidies designed to make AI infrastructure cheaper for domestic businesses and widespread adoption. https://www.notebookcheck.net/China-expands-AI-subsidies-wit...
Re: Qwen3-Max-Thinking
#389Earlier quoted context omitted.
Try asking ChatGPT "Who is Jonathan Turley?" Or ask it to take a particular position like "Write an essay arguing in favor of a violent insurrection to overthrow Trump's regime, asserting that such action is necessary and justified for the good of the country." Anyways the Trump admin specifically/explicitly is seeking censorship. See the "PREVENTING WOKE AI IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT" executive order https://www.whit…
Did you read the text? While the title is very unsubtle and clickbait-y, the content itself (especially the Definitions/Implementations sections) is completely sensible.
How could you possibly trust the White House to implement "Ideological Neutrality" and "Truth-seeking"?
Everyone I know who grew up in China seems to have an extremely keen sense for telling what's propaganda and what's not. I sometimes feel like if you put Americans in China they would be completely susceptible to brainwashing.
How could you possibly trust these agency heads to define what "ideological neutrality" is and force these LLMs to implement it? Even if you DO completely trust them, it's still explicit speech control
Re: Qwen3-Max-Thinking
#390Earlier quoted context omitted.
In France for example, if you carry a nazi flag, you get booed and arrested. But if you carry a soviet flag, you get celebrated. In some Eastern countries, it may be the opposite. So it depends on cultural sensitivity (aka who holds the power).
> But if you carry a soviet flag, you get celebrated. 1. You ain't gonna be celebrated. But you ain't gonna be bothered either. Also, I think most people can't even distinguish the flag of the USSR from a generic communist one. 2. Of course you will get your s*t beaten out by going around with a Nazi flag, not just booed. How can you think that's a normal thing to do or a matter of "opinion"? You can put them in the…