$99/mo is for FSD, not just lane keeping. The article doesn’t explain what happens to simple lane leeping. Surely it should be free like in any other car (like my Volvo).
Lane keep is autopilot which is going away (for new cars). FSD doesn't have basic lane keep. The real question will be what happens to "legacy" cars with autopilot.
Tesla kills Autopilot, locks lane-keeping behind $99/month fee
381–388 of 388 posts
Re: Tesla kills Autopilot, locks lane-keeping behind $99/month fee
#382Earlier quoted context omitted.
it's click-bait, the lane keeping is free and is not going away
Do you have a source for that? I thought all of Tesla's "default" driver assistance was part of Autopilot, which is going away. I haven't seen any mention of decoupling various features from Autopilot (with some remaining free, just without the branding).
Re: Tesla kills Autopilot, locks lane-keeping behind $99/month fee
#383I've been using Autopilot for years, but recently subscribed to FSD for a long weekend roadtrip. It changed my mind on the value of FSD. While unfortunate for consumers, it cleans up the offerings. For four years, I didn't buy FSD because Autopilot was good enough to cover highway driving and I couldn't justify $99/month for the "last mile". If you strip out Autopilot and given the latest FSD, I would 100% buy the FS…
I agree. The current price is 7/8 years of ownership, which can't be transferred. The subscription currently makes a lot more sense. Personally, I think if one buys a Tesla today they should impute the cost of an FSD subscription over the expected lifetime. It's excellent. If that cost is too high, fair enough. Buy a less smart car.
Re: Tesla kills Autopilot, locks lane-keeping behind $99/month fee
#384I'm glad I got rid of my Teslas, they are always doing their best to make the experience worse. Stage three of enshittification from them. I loved it back when it was stage 1.
What did you move to? The speed is what I like, and the simplicity when I bought it. I hate 10,000 trim options with random prices like BMW and having to argue with a sales guy - just gimme the price!
Re: Tesla kills Autopilot, locks lane-keeping behind $99/month fee
#385Earlier quoted context omitted.
The subscription model seems to profit off of inertia/inaction/forgetfulness/laziness. There's a whole app called rocket money to fight back against the subscription model by helping you find and cancel subs. I've never used it and don't plan to but it would be cool if it helped push back against the modern shift towards subscription-everything. Although if we're talking about software or anything else that could eas…
Rocket Money is an app designed for millennials to hand over their important banking information to Rocket Mortgage in exchange for "help cancelling subscriptions".
Genuine question because as mentioned I don't use the product (nor do I care enough to rabbit hole).
Re: Tesla kills Autopilot, locks lane-keeping behind $99/month fee
#386Earlier quoted context omitted.
What is the alternative? I'm not advocating causing shoplifters to crash, but I do like the idea that the police pursue criminals. You can imagine some kind of built in remote kill switch, but I can't see that being advocated here.
You attempt to ID them and pick them up later, and if you can't, you let them go.
Re: Tesla kills Autopilot, locks lane-keeping behind $99/month fee
#387Earlier quoted context omitted.
This sounds like almost every other product I buy, except it's designed to eventually save a lot of lives? Imagine being mad that a kitchen knife has no liability for what you do with it, or a motorcycle.
Currently it's more dangerous to use FSD than to not use FSD. They can charge me when it's not a danger to society; I will gladly pay. Most likely I will be paying Waymo.
Re: Tesla kills Autopilot, locks lane-keeping behind $99/month fee
#388Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a stunt. If they believed it worked, they wouldn't need somebody dedicated to monitoring it for the entire time it's on the road. Having nobody in the car looks cool, but there is nothing different about the car's self driving capability, and the economics are even worse than having the safety driver in the car.
It's no different on a technical level than Waymo using remote operators. Presumably Tesla just hasn't wired that up, or doesn't plan to. FWIW, your logic works better the other way around anyway: if the system didn't work, there would be easily-accessible proof to that effect showing the resulting hilarity as the operator needed to step in. There isn't. And... of course there isn't. Because FSD is real and works and…
Waymo doesn't have one or more operators dedicated to each vehicle for the entire time it is on the road. That is massively different. The latest disengagement data for FSD 14 shows that Tesla is still behind where Waymo was more than a decade ago.