Live data from Hacker News

Everything's broken and nobody's upset

hanselman.com

381–390 of 418 posts

Re: Everything's broken and nobody's upset

#381

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're after something that does one job and does it well, is there a reason why you've chosen those phones over a very basic Nokia model (or something similar)?

Contact sync. Application selection.

But aren't these exactly the sorts of new features that you're complaining companies are putting into their products rather than perfecting their core capabilities (i.e. making phone calls and sending SMS)?

Re: Everything's broken and nobody's upset

#382

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree, wife and I wash most of our dishes, she washes, I dry. It's a great time to let your mind wonder and think about problems. Mindless tasks like drying dishes and scooping the cat box give me a chance to actually think about things in a no pressure environment.

Just wait, kids change everything!

Yup, having the first baby was when we got a dishwasher.

Re: Everything's broken and nobody's upset

#383
I'm about to say something shameful, something no software developer should ever proclaim. In my personal time, whenever software crashes or errors out, I am often given a prompt (varies depending on the OS/application): Report the error, or ignore.

As an engineer who has spent invaluable hours combing over end user bug reports through services like Windows Error Reporting and the like, I am incredibly thankful for each and every user that took the time to click 'Report'. And I owe my firstborn to the benevolent few who choose to write detailed comments to accompany their reports.

But alone, in the dark, ready to edit a photo or browse Reddit- I click 'Ignore'. Why? Because fuck you, that's why. My rage at uncaught exceptions bubbles up into my brain and the stack reports, "you shall not get any info out of me." This is clearly wrong, but it's my impulse. That's all.

Re: Everything's broken and nobody's upset

#384

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Clearly some of these are life choices, and important ones which almost certainly make sense to you, but one thing; No dishwasher? I don't really understand this. My dishwasher has a single wheel and a switch. The switch is "heated dry" [ON|OFF] and the wheel sets to one of three positions ("light wash", "normal wash", "medium wash"). If you're only washing dishes for one then I guess this makes sense, but I fail to…

My latest dishwasher is 'energy star'. What that means is, every year they have to use 10% less energy and water. After the last 10 years, the dishwasher uses almost no enery nor water. And it doesn't get the dishes clean. And there's no way to override it. My water comes from a well. Its plentiful and free. Its pointless to save a gallon, and make me hand-wash half the dishes.

I couldn't find anything to back up the claim that the appliances have to use 10% less energy and water each year. Do you have any documentation to back that up? You'd think this would show up in product reviews after a while?

Doesn't you dishwasher have any adjustment to set the temperature or length of the cycle? What model do you have?

My appliances are all "A" rated (EU energy label), but to get that rating for the dishwasher I have to use the "eco program", and I'd think there was something similar in the US?

Re: Everything's broken and nobody's upset

#385

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But most engineering projects don't have hundreds of millions of moving parts. At that scale, standard practice becomes intractable. The Space Shuttle went up the first time with a few K of core memory. The software effort was really pretty trivial compared with systems today.

The article is from 1996 but even then they were far beyond a few K. "Take the upgrade of the software to permit the shuttle to navigate with Global Positioning Satellites, a change that involves just 1.5% of the program, or 6,366 lines of code. The specs for that one change run 2,500 pages, a volume thicker than a phone book. The specs for the current program fill 30 volumes and run 40,000 pages."

The brain of NASA’s primary vehicle has the computational power of an IBM 5150, that ’80s icon that goes for $20 at yard sales. According to NASA and IBM, the shuttle’s General Purpose Computer (GPC)—which controls, among other things, the entire launch sequence—is an upgrade of the 500-kilobyte computer the shuttle flew with until 1991.

  --  http://www.popsci.com/node/31716

Re: Everything's broken and nobody's upset

#386

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My latest dishwasher is 'energy star'. What that means is, every year they have to use 10% less energy and water. After the last 10 years, the dishwasher uses almost no enery nor water. And it doesn't get the dishes clean. And there's no way to override it. My water comes from a well. Its plentiful and free. Its pointless to save a gallon, and make me hand-wash half the dishes.

I couldn't find anything to back up the claim that the appliances have to use 10% less energy and water each year. Do you have any documentation to back that up? You'd think this would show up in product reviews after a while? Doesn't you dishwasher have any adjustment to set the temperature or length of the cycle? What model do you have? My appliances are all "A" rated (EU energy label), but to get that rating for t…

YEah, that is not a supportable claim. Probably the appliance dealer was speaking colloquially. In any case the federal standard changes pretty regularly, resulting in an erratic dropping of electric consumption requirements.

There are plenty of buttons on the washer (which is a user-interface nightmare of its own). Two help a little: 'Heavy Duty' and 'Extra Rinse'. Selecting both leaves the clothes smelling slightly less of sweat and dirt. And of course when the cycle completes, it turns off to save (miniscule) power. Turning it on results in the default settings again!

Googling it, I see no hack to defeat the settings. Just a lot of talk about strange error codes and how to reset them. Sigh.

Re: Everything's broken and nobody's upset

#387

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Contact sync. Application selection.

But aren't these exactly the sorts of new features that you're complaining companies are putting into their products rather than perfecting their core capabilities (i.e. making phone calls and sending SMS)?

You're putting words in my mouth. Nowhere did I draw a line in the sand - you're attempting to do that for me.

And I'm a little unclear why you feel like playing "gotcha" with me here anyway...

Re: Everything's broken and nobody's upset

#388

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I couldn't find anything to back up the claim that the appliances have to use 10% less energy and water each year. Do you have any documentation to back that up? You'd think this would show up in product reviews after a while? Doesn't you dishwasher have any adjustment to set the temperature or length of the cycle? What model do you have? My appliances are all "A" rated (EU energy label), but to get that rating for t…

YEah, that is not a supportable claim. Probably the appliance dealer was speaking colloquially. In any case the federal standard changes pretty regularly, resulting in an erratic dropping of electric consumption requirements. There are plenty of buttons on the washer (which is a user-interface nightmare of its own). Two help a little: 'Heavy Duty' and 'Extra Rinse'. Selecting both leaves the clothes smelling slightly…

OK, I'm curious what kind of model you have. Is it a top or front loaded?

Mine (front loaded) has a pre-wash (2 hour program) or "soaking" mode for extra dirty clothes (4h), and I can select temperatures from 0-90 degrees celsius, but most clothes get clean at 40 degrees.

I had to do an obscure button trick described in the user manual to have it remember the previous settings after a completed cycle, though.

Re: Everything's broken and nobody's upset

#389
post #81
post #35

The blurb on the sidebar proclaims Scott's MS experience. It's surprising to see someone with a Microsoft background making this complaint. MS spends more effort than any software company on testing, not only in just plain hiring lots of testers, but also on formal methods. They have some of the top formal methods people in the world doing research for them, and armies of people trying to put that research into pract…

> ACL2 is old and crusty We have many new shiny FM tools now, though, that are far closer to regular programming languages. In particular, Agda, Coq, Isabelle are fairly easy to pick up for people with an FP background (rather than a formal methods background). The breakthroughs in SMT solver performance have been astounding to watch, and their use for "brute force" FM is certainly growing. Of course, verified code i…

I'm using Coq for a formal method class and the CoqIde is a piece of software that falls into this category. If I have two files open and I run a search, there is a good chance that the CoqIde will crash and I'll lose my work. I've worked around it by saving my work before I search but I shouldn't have to worry about searching in an IDE

Re: Everything's broken and nobody's upset

#390

Earlier quoted context omitted.

YEah, that is not a supportable claim. Probably the appliance dealer was speaking colloquially. In any case the federal standard changes pretty regularly, resulting in an erratic dropping of electric consumption requirements. There are plenty of buttons on the washer (which is a user-interface nightmare of its own). Two help a little: 'Heavy Duty' and 'Extra Rinse'. Selecting both leaves the clothes smelling slightly…

OK, I'm curious what kind of model you have. Is it a top or front loaded? Mine (front loaded) has a pre-wash (2 hour program) or "soaking" mode for extra dirty clothes (4h), and I can select temperatures from 0-90 degrees celsius, but most clothes get clean at 40 degrees. I had to do an obscure button trick described in the user manual to have it remember the previous settings after a completed cycle, though.

Not in the laundry room right now, but its from Sears, top-loaded (cramped laundry room doesn't permit front-loading), all electronic, has no agitator(!) and is a piece of junk.

Maybe I can find a trick in the manual; thanks for that idea.

Post reply on HN