Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly. So then why draw conclusions about how SolarCity was a bad deal for shareholders (see parent comments)? There's no substantiation of that either way.
Because Tesla abandoned the SolarCity model? Like, SolarCity was a bunch of sales people going door-to-door to sell questionable leases on solar systems and hawking off the junk bonds resulting.
I have a SolarCity install that came with the house.
The Power Purchase Agreement lease seemed shady at first, but ultimately I believe it's working out better for my family than for Tesla.
I'm paying just under 11 cents per kWh and it can only go up a maximum of 3% per year for the next ~15 years.