Live data from Hacker News

Meta Wants More AI Bots on Facebook and Instagram

nymag.com

381–390 of 402 posts

Re: Meta Wants More AI Bots on Facebook and Instagram

#381

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It might be heavy, but I really like the idea of someone building this to run offline and completely on-device. Maybe branded as a sort of 'personal journal with an audience'. My experience with mobile diaries is the biggest challenge is encouraging the user to keep up the habit. I'm very curious if this could be solved by introducing a new cycle of feedback from AI peers who would feign curiosity about my life. Coul…

Does it come with people picking you apart, hatemail, unsolicited nudes, etc.?

The bots have canceled me.

Re: Meta Wants More AI Bots on Facebook and Instagram

#382
post #318
post #251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Especially because you know a bunch of people will pay for it.

I'd rather have those who get high off this kind of attention satisfy that need with a bot than foster in echo chambers, which is what usually happens.

So, let bots controlled by mega tech corps and vicious governments brainwash these people, rather than other ignorant humans who don’t, at least not by definition, have ulterior motives?

Re: Meta Wants More AI Bots on Facebook and Instagram

#383

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Palantir CEO at the 2024 Reagan National Defense Forum: > Our adversaries do not have our moral compunction if it's even. They will take advantage of our niceness, kindness, our desire to be at home in Nebraska or New Hampshire or wherever we live in our peaceful environments. And they need to wake up scared and go to bed scared. > My version of service is the soldiers are happier, the enemies are scared, and America…

That quote may sound vaguely creepy, but fundamentally he's got a good point. The most brutal wars tend to be wars where both sides are roughly evenly matched. WW1 and WW2 were so deadly because both alliances consisted of several industrialized nations. We're lucky that we haven't seen total war between major industrial powers since that time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwKPFT-RioU

It's because they were industrialized first, and evenly matched only a distant second.

Re: Meta Wants More AI Bots on Facebook and Instagram

#384

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Influencers are drug dealers , not drug users , and they're in this for the money, not for the high.

Maybe at the very top, but the middle is full of wannabees looking to be a rockstar for the clout/popularity.

> wannabees looking to be a rockstar for the clout/popularity.

In order to get money. Hardly anyone cares for this kind of popularity just for the sake of it, but a lot of kids these days dream of the money and lifestyle they see from top influencers.

Re: Meta Wants More AI Bots on Facebook and Instagram

#385

This gave me a funny idea for a new social media app... One that's centered around "you" and filled with thousands/millions of LLM bots praising you, treating you like a celebrity, etc. Each of your posts will get tens of thousands of "likes", hundreds of comments, etc. Dm's straight to your feed, people wanting you, etc etc. If the newsfeed is already mostly "the algorithm", might as well take it to the extreme. I b…

You made me think of an interesting aspect of Meta’s plans.

If Meta allows their own bots but blocks 3rd party bots, could that be an antitrust concern?

IANAL, so I’m just asking a question here.

Re: Meta Wants More AI Bots on Facebook and Instagram

#386
post #171

Facebook Meta has been making baffling bets lately. They spent tens of billions building a metaverse with the belief that people want to spend their days in a creepy legless 3d avatar of themselves that is pretty effective at simulating what it feels to have body dysphoria, playing with their other legless friends and spending a lot of money customizing their dysphoric avatars. Now they believe what users really want…

They probably looking at their metrics and finding their primary user base loves AI content. https://www.buzzfeed.com/sienaegiljum/ai-images-facebook-boo...

[deleted]

Re: Meta Wants More AI Bots on Facebook and Instagram

#387
post #41

My FB timeline is already a complete mess with most irrelevant garbage as it stands. Not exactly sure what adding additional 'noise' is going to achieve outside of boosting numbers (which I guess is what they want). A current snapshot my feed: - Group post (from one I follow) - Ad - Post (from company I don't follow) - Group post (from Group I don't follow) - Group post (from one I follow) - Ad - Group post (from Gro…

No one makes posts like they did in 2011. Fb has to do this or the site looks dead.

Re: Meta Wants More AI Bots on Facebook and Instagram

#388
post #45
post #41

My FB timeline is already a complete mess with most irrelevant garbage as it stands. Not exactly sure what adding additional 'noise' is going to achieve outside of boosting numbers (which I guess is what they want). A current snapshot my feed: - Group post (from one I follow) - Ad - Post (from company I don't follow) - Group post (from Group I don't follow) - Group post (from one I follow) - Ad - Group post (from Gro…

Why are you still using it? I dropped FB about 12 years ago, have not looked back since. I ask people this question who still use FB and complain about terrible it is. They answer with some generic "to stay in touch with such and such" which is easier and less invasive to do with SMS or email. So, why are you still using it?

Friends and relations afar.

Re: Meta Wants More AI Bots on Facebook and Instagram

#389

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Read this post to yourself aloud. Why are you still checking Facebook? Keep the messenger app on your phone if people you know still use it.

Not OP, but my global friend network still has folks who post life updates on Facebook, making it a requirement.

Or you can reach out to people you are interested in, and ask what is new with them.

Re: Meta Wants More AI Bots on Facebook and Instagram

#390

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wait really? Matt was boomeranged?

Here's the announcement post - https://x.com/michaelsayman/status/1835841675584811239 Looks like his name's Michael and that indeed, he's presently at Meta. If you end up reading this Michael, great product!

My bad, my brain crossed wires with two M names.
Post reply on HN