Live data from Hacker News

Fuck being productive

dostoynikov.bearblog.dev

381–382 of 382 posts

Re: Fuck being productive

#381
post #363

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What Kortilla said matches my experience at a few companies. But I wouldn’t be surprised if there are different/worse ecosystems out there. Also just working harder doesn’t guarantee anything, which some employees misunderstand—communicate with your manager! You need to work on the right things and understand leveling expectations and promo cadences, and of course your manager is hugely important.

"leveling expectations" are mostly pure nonsense, you should know that. People are promoted for visibility in the eyes of management and delivering the final product, but not real ownership of the actual work that goes into advocating for and building the correct solution (which management is often clueless about, since it involves details which may seem minute but are essential to producing real value).

> but not real ownership of the actual work that goes into advocating for and building the correct solution

What you think is the correct solution is often not the correct appropriation of engineering resources for the business.

> which management is often clueless about

It is your job as an engineer to communicate this to management. If you are not capable of doing do so, you are incompetent as an engineer. Being an engineer isn’t being paid to just build whatever you want. That’s how you end up with Juicero.

Re: Fuck being productive

#382
post #361

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What if I were to tell you performing at 200% is not a good way to get a promotion? I will promote the person with regular output and an eye for outcomes, doing the right thing, improving process, etc over the one who just blindly runs at full steam all of the time. If you think you’re at 200% and not getting recognized, step back and evaluate how much it’s really helping. If you think it is, write out the argument y…

> I will promote the person with regular output and an eye for outcomes, doing the right thing, improving process, etc over the one who just blindly runs at full steam all of the time. I would consider that to be impactful and part of performing at 200%, yet it still won't necessarily lead to promotions. Most managers don't care about the team or company, and definitely don't promote based on stuff like "improve proc…

> Most managers don't care about the team or company, and definitely don't promote based on stuff like "improve process"

This does not match my experience at literally any software company (including multiple failing startups, a successful startup, and huge corporations).

I suspect your issue is that you’re not actually aware of what was providing value to the company you worked for and your managers were caring about seemingly inexplicable things.

Post reply on HN