Earlier quoted context omitted.
> for remote communities, small planes are an absolute necessity No problems there, so long as remote means not here, except lack of specifics. What remote communities have an absolute necessity for small planes? > Hobby flying is far from the only environmentally damaging thing that humans do only for entertainment. This is Whataboutism, a variant of the tu quoque fallacy, but it also has maybe a bit of Bandwagon fa…
>No problems there, so long as remote means not here, except lack of specifics. What remote communities have an absolute necessity for small planes? There are plenty in Northern Canada [1]. That is the only area I've been personally, but I imagine there are similar areas around the world. Possibly also of interest is bush flying in general [2]. > This is Whataboutism, a variant of the tu quoque fallacy, but it also h…
It's sometimes called the 'fallacy fallacy': the assertion that because the argument is fallacious the conclusions are also necessarily false (as opposed to potentially true but infelicitously argued).