Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can see it being possible to have had some effect, but I do not see having been a major force. As far as I remember, Republicans did not want to expand access to healthcare at all if you did not already have it due to being very poor or old. Many Democrats wanted to expand taxpayer funded healthcare, but they did not have the numbers to get it passed. Hence a compromise had to be reached. Getting taxpayer funded he…
> Even in a taxpayer funded scenario, I would bet the doctor is going to have to get approval from the system to provide a treatment above a certain cost. That happens due to scarce resources. Most often in developing countries. Where I live, there are places doctors work at that barely have water for them to wash their hands. Ordering an MRI is a big deal. I refuse to believe this would ever be a problem for the US.
We have a special visa for doctors willing to live in undesirable areas of the US for many years. There is even a website for it:
https://data.hrsa.gov/tools/shortage-area
https://www.hhs.gov/guidance/document/hpsa-and-muap-shortage...
And now to meet demand for doctors without having to pay for more doctors, most states have allowed a Nurse Practitioner or Physician Assistant to basically practice as a doctor where a doctor just oversees their clerical work. So if you have lesser insurance coverage or live in an area with insufficient doctors, then you may see an NP or PA who is far less qualified than a doctor.