Live data from Hacker News

Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid sharing salary ranges

reddit.com

381–390 of 406 posts

Re: Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid sharing salary ranges

#381
post #59
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this feels a little disingenuous. the dude is a public facing exec that said shitty stuff about women, working at a company that heavily signals it won’t be like that. it seems like a lower level employee with the same views wouldn’t write a book including them or be liable for those views. context is important

It shouldn't matter what his role is. Saying some off the cuff stuff a few years ago in an obscure book doesn't make a workplace unsafe. That is disingenuous. I've seen people fired for similar "unsafe" bullshit. Literally anything can trigger these deranged individuals. They're just out to play victim and get attention. And no, I don't think all toxic workplace behaviour is like this, many places have narcissists an…

Only part of 1 passage was in the context of an apocalypse hypothetical.

Re: Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid sharing salary ranges

#382

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Home inspectors are a borderline scam. In my experience they never find any of the real problems and only surface superficial stuff that should be obvious even to a layman. This probably is because many buyers go with the inspector recommendation of their realtor and realtors aren’t going to recommend someone that is too through to the point of risking the deal.

In that vein realtors are basically a scam. A decent inspector can and will find things, but true it may be difficult to find one. I think the solution is going to be an unpopular take--learn about the world and be able to do a lot of this stuff yourself. I bought my house without a realtor and without an inspection. My house needed work for sure, but I got a great deal and learning experience in both the buying and…

Realtors are a scam.

Re: Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid sharing salary ranges

#383

I think one reason why this is difficult for companies that are hiring software engineers, is that they can hire at multiple levels of experience. They just need good developers! A company that needs, say, a Golang developer, or Scala, or React, might be willing to hire a junior, mid-level or senior developer- they'll take whatever experience level they can get. Remember, saying that you don't want to hire someone to…

It's expected/appreciated that applicants should put in the effort to tailor their resumes and cover letters for each job posting they apply. So why are companies taking the lazy route?

A single job posting shouldn't aim for all levels of devs. There should be separate postings for each level with specific requirements/expectations and a salary range to go with it.

Bigger companies do/should know how many devs they need for each level. Smaller companies would benefit from being more organized too.

Re: Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid sharing salary ranges

#384

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Amazing, they have to notify about jobs in Thailand to Colorado employees? Love it.

Why not? When I worked at BT they did - a nice one or two year posting abroad on full ride expat status looks good on the CV.

BT has operations in Thailand?

Re: Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid sharing salary ranges

#385

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you happen to see the part where I explained that a company could hire someone at a relatively junior, mid-level or senior opening- in an extremely competitive market for software developers? Like, let's say you're X Startup, you desperately need a Golang developer, not having another good Golang developer on your team is costing you Y amounts of money per month, and you just can't find one in your preferred expe…

I understand that some companies might want to do this, but it’s explicitly not giving clear salary ranges for certain positions. It’s basically saying “we will pay you whatever, based on what we determine you are worth,” which is precisely the status quo that transparent salary advocates want to change.

I know this is a bit of a loaded term, and I'm trying to use this in a non-political/nonpartisan context here- but isn't paying people based on rigid salary bands a bit, uh, Communistic? Like yes the company should pay you, an individual, based on what they're worth- if someone has 3 years of experience but they're better than someone with 10 years, shouldn't they be paid more? I thought tech culture was about individualism.

You know who definitely has preset salary ranges for years of experience and isn't paying based on individual ability? The government & heavily unionized jobs. Seniority Trumps Everything there. I dunno, is that the world we want? I thought tech was philosophically opposed to that kind of mediocrity?

Re: Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid sharing salary ranges

#386
post #366

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Also, making decisions around catching Tesla or GME at the right timing in the market… that’s not a great starting point for investment strategy. I thought the same thing for years, and just avoided the market except for a 401k and stock granted by companies I worked at. Then I got into trading because I thought I could make money trading volatile stocks and I've never looked back (I've already made enough to retir…

Do you think your case is a typical case? How much does experience count? How much did you need to educate yourself to reach this level? Were there any major stumbles or obstacles? I am encouraged by your story, but am also weary that it only sounds reasonable because all the harrowing details were left out.

I think I got lucky, but I think luck is required to be successful at anything (including coding). I actually haven't had any bad luck yet, the only stocks I've lost money on so far have been some of my value stocks. I fully expect some of my risky investments to go south.

The best advice I can give is pretty generic - follow the data. First of all actually find the data. Don't trust some finance news rag to tell you anything meaningful, some of them actually have a direct incentive to lie to you. Now that you have the data, what does it say? This sounds simple, but everyone told me I was an idiot to invest in GME in January. They said the same thing in March. So far my investment in GME has more than a 10x ROI. I'm just using GME as an example because it's topical - people tell me I'm in a cult while I'm actively making money betting against them.

"Buy the rumor, sell the news" is pretty easy to understand, just find a stock you know well (I would guess something in tech, like Alphabet or Amazon but whatever) and look at dates for stock movements, rumors, and announcements. You can do this retroactively to find a pattern then try to apply it moving forward. "Never invest in something you don't understand" is general advice outside of stocks, but just an extension of what I said initially - do your own research until it makes sense to you.

I think a huge amount of inertia is just people afraid to try it because they've been conditioned their entire lives to believe they can't make money doing it. I'm quickly realizing how much of this is bullshit (I realize I'm lucky and I understand I'm likely in a local maxima, but I am still extremely confident a lot of the things I've been told are just wrong). So take a small amount of money and invest it and see how it goes. Learn. Iterate. Improve. The goal is to start making money before you lose it. I actually started with just $10k and once I started to figure it out put in more money as I wanted to increase my profit.

At the end of the day it's your money and you should do what you want with it. So long as you understand you will definitely lose money sometimes and are willing to learn from it, give it a go with whatever money you're willing to lose.

Re: Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid sharing salary ranges

#387
post #290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does anybody know if there is a secondary market for home inspection reports? I know that the two times I was involved with a home purchase in the U.S., I needed to hire a home inspector. But the interested party in front of me also had to hire a home inspector. Would it not make sense for the interested parties to split the cost for one home inspector rather than reproducing the work? After all, copying information…

A bit tangential: Back in the early 90s — on a recommendation from a realtor who was a close friend of my brother's — I hired an inspector who was close to retirement. He worked with his wife who served as his assistant tasked with, in essence, taking dictation of her husband's near constant commentary as he conducted an incredibly thorough inspection. Every outlet tested for proper ground, every nook and cranny look…

> very fast sale of the house which we did without a realtor

How did you find a buyer without a realtor? Are you able get into the listing databases without using a realtor? Any special tips for selling without a realtor?

Re: Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid sharing salary ranges

#388
post #367
post #290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A bit tangential: Back in the early 90s — on a recommendation from a realtor who was a close friend of my brother's — I hired an inspector who was close to retirement. He worked with his wife who served as his assistant tasked with, in essence, taking dictation of her husband's near constant commentary as he conducted an incredibly thorough inspection. Every outlet tested for proper ground, every nook and cranny look…

If anyone knows what the magic words are to finding this kind of thorough report nowadays, please share!

"Time Machine" are the only words that come to mind, alas.

Re: Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid sharing salary ranges

#389

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The at&t monopoly came about via government power,... That is what I wrote, yes. AT&T knew who to "lobby". That is information asymmetry.

You would have to establish that no one else knew who to lobby, which is far from clear. Also I know exactly who to lobby for certain things I need from the city, but that clearly isn’t enough, because my lobbying efforts have failed miserably.

The asymmetry is in more than one area, those where only examples, and they probably have an asymmetric advantage over you in all areas.

That is why, even if you know who to lobby you can't get a meeting, but they meet everyday. You don't know who to bribe to get a meeting. And on and on.

Re: Companies excluding Coloradans from remote jobs to avoid sharing salary ranges

#390

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I’m looking for a job, it’s already on me to try to limit my search to positions I’m qualified for. Providing me with the salary information for each job doesn’t make that task any more difficult.

But they don't and yet you still have a job (I hope). And the reason is because when you are looking for a job other things are more important than knowing the salary even before you apply or they seriously consider you. Everyone does whatever they can get away with, and the moment we accept that everything becomes clear. They are all trying to benefit themselves, just as you are by trying to learn some information b…

Salary is the single most important thing to know about a position. If a job doesn't pay enough to cover my mortgage, I couldn't care less about the commute, the inclusive culture or how great their lunchroom is or even whether I'm qualified. It's a non-starter before I even read the description.

Having to write a cover letter, customize a resume and sit through multiple interviews just to find out if I can literally afford to work for you is not acceptable and the only reason companies get away with it is because all the other companies do it. This trend needs to die and it needs to die a decade ago.

Post reply on HN