Live data from Hacker News

Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices

wsj.com

381–390 of 689 posts

Re: Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices

#381

Makes you wonder how these companies ever planned to last during the "next" economic downturn. I don't think anyone bet on a global pandemic causing this shock but the point still stands: These kind of companies were still burning cash at incredible rates 10+ years in. How were they ever going to survive?

[deleted]

Re: Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices

#382

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> You have man-years worth of work going nowhere as projects get scrapped mid-development. That's better than seeing man-years go into features that get deployed. I witnessed one successful control system company spin up a team of new hotshot UI engineers, all right out of the best schools. After months of work the team "updated" the product. Withing hours the call center was hit with hundreds of "You changed the g-…

[flagged]

You need to me more accepting of people words what he said was fine maybe he prefers traditional grammar and you just need to accept people

Re: Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices

#383

Developers at unicorns: even in the best of times, do you feel more expendable than you've felt at other jobs? We always are amazed at the number of developers at companies like this. (the numbers I've seen are old, but I guess out of 22,000 employees, it was something like 5000 engineers?) While that allows you to build in a more robust way than a smaller company, it seems like there's no shortage of developers work…

It's not about in unicorns or not. It's about the scope and impact of your projects, both of which have more to do with the size than the PR status of a company. When the quantity of people in a company exceeds the quantity of work, you'll be much more expendable. Following this type of logic, joining Uber in 2015 or later is a bad idea. Joining airbnb in 2015 is a bad idea. Joining Google now is likely a bad idea. J…

These heuristics are interesting. Do you have concrete numbers for some of the big techs?

Re: Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices

#384
post #267

Developers at unicorns: even in the best of times, do you feel more expendable than you've felt at other jobs? We always are amazed at the number of developers at companies like this. (the numbers I've seen are old, but I guess out of 22,000 employees, it was something like 5000 engineers?) While that allows you to build in a more robust way than a smaller company, it seems like there's no shortage of developers work…

I've never worked for a true unicorn but I've been in companies that got a sudden success and grew way too big way too fast. I think you can tell from the inside when a company loses its way. As you mention, suddenly you have tons of teams working on what seems to be fairly niche aspects of the company's product. You have man-years worth of work going nowhere as projects get scrapped mid-development. You start having…

[deleted]

Re: Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices

#386

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> You have man-years worth of work going nowhere as projects get scrapped mid-development. That's better than seeing man-years go into features that get deployed. I witnessed one successful control system company spin up a team of new hotshot UI engineers, all right out of the best schools. After months of work the team "updated" the product. Withing hours the call center was hit with hundreds of "You changed the g-…

[flagged]

I presume all the developers are men? as in members of mankind... All people are men.

Re: Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices

#387
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Look more at car service companies (Uber's original service), not taxis.

Why? For the vast majority of people, Uber is a taxi service.

The reason is that car service drivers are also being replaced and they are more likely to have been FTEs.

Re: Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices

#388

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if there is a way to convert Harvard Business Review articles into top-of-the-backlog items automatically...

There's your Startup Idea!

You jest, but an email to backlog service is something some managers might buy.

Re: Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices

#389

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> You have man-years worth of work going nowhere as projects get scrapped mid-development. That's better than seeing man-years go into features that get deployed. I witnessed one successful control system company spin up a team of new hotshot UI engineers, all right out of the best schools. After months of work the team "updated" the product. Withing hours the call center was hit with hundreds of "You changed the g-…

[flagged]

> I'm not saying anything about anyone's intent

Well then don't say anything at all. It adds nothing to the conversation. Don't push your ideals on others. Take your SJW crusade elsewhere. That's one positive thing from this pandemic - the shift in focus away from these types of (IMO) non-existent 'problems.'

Re: Uber cuts 3000 more jobs, closes 45 offices

#390
post #267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've never worked for a true unicorn but I've been in companies that got a sudden success and grew way too big way too fast. I think you can tell from the inside when a company loses its way. As you mention, suddenly you have tons of teams working on what seems to be fairly niche aspects of the company's product. You have man-years worth of work going nowhere as projects get scrapped mid-development. You start having…

>> You have man-years worth of work going nowhere as projects get scrapped mid-development. That's better than seeing man-years go into features that get deployed. I witnessed one successful control system company spin up a team of new hotshot UI engineers, all right out of the best schools. After months of work the team "updated" the product. Withing hours the call center was hit with hundreds of "You changed the g-…

> The trick is to squeeze your long-term UI project in the same update as some routine security fixes. Then the clients are forced to learn the new system.

Is this sarcasm? Seems like a really user-hostile attitude if not. Admittedly, my personal point-of-view is that the majority of UI updates are make-work for engineers and PMs with at best no value added, and at worst negative value created (as you experienced).

Post reply on HN